(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Recall that Congressman Mike Coffman of Aurora promised to vote for the first House measure to kill Obamacare, a repeal-and-replace measure that would have taken away health insurance from millions of people.
Then he voted against the second House repeal-and-replace bill, which also would have pushed millions off the health insurance rolls, and it seemed his first promised vote disappeared.
Now it turns out that he’d have also voted for the repeal-later measure, which would leave an unknown number millions with no health insurance.
Asked by 9News’ Marshall Zelinger Aug. 6 (at 1:30 here) if he’d support a “straight repeal,” Coffman replied:
Coffman: “If you said, ‘Well, okay, we’re going to repeal,’ and the date certain for the repeal was long enough out, where it wouldn’t disrupt the markets, and it gave Congress adequate time, I think that would be appropriate.”
It’s worth getting more details from Coffman, whose office doesn’t return my calls, in case it comes up again.
Why does he think there could be agreement on an Obamacare replacement in the future when there was no agreement in seven years?
When he says he wants a date-certain for an Obamacare repeal to be “far enough out,” does he mean longer than seven years? How long?
Why wouldn’t the uncertainty of not having a replacement in hand disrupt the markets no matter how “far out” the repael date is, given the inability of Republicans to agree on a replacement in seven years?
Those are a few of the questions for Coffman.
An early version of this post incorrectly characterized Coffman’s proposal as repeal-now-and-replace-later.