CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 24, 2017 02:58 PM UTC

"Corycare"—The Bizarre Two-Step Continues

  • 16 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Sen. Cory Gardner (R).

With yet another vote in the U.S. Senate on repealing the Affordable Care Act set for tomorrow, here’s what Colorado’s U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner had to say about the state of play at this weekend’s Western Conservative Summit via the Denver Post’s Brian Eason:

Over the shouts of protesters who sought to disrupt his speech, U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner on Friday told a conservative gathering that he would “address the issue of health care” in the coming week, doubling down on Republican promises to repeal Obamacare, even as the effort’s success is increasingly in doubt… [Pols emphasis]

In his remarks, Gardner spoke largely in generalities, pledging to “get Washington out of the way” and “give consumers more choice, more options and more freedom” when it comes to health care. He also reiterated comments he made in an interview with The Denver Post earlier this week, suggesting that cuts to Medicaid may be needed “to make sure that we focus our health care efforts on those who need it the most.”

“What has happened is government has tried to grow so much that is has created instability in our most important safety net program,” Gardner said Friday.

Sounds like Gardner’s a “yes” vote, right? Colorado Public Radio says think again:

Republican U.S. Sen. Cory Gardner will not say whether he supports a possible effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act without legislation to replace it. Senate leadership has proposed a vote on a straight repeal of the ACA after a GOP replacement bill failed to get off the ground.

“I don’t know that’s something that’s going to be coming up, and I don’t want to speculate on how I would vote on a bill that we don’t know if it’s going to be there or not,” Gardner said… [Pols emphasis]

Gardner’s whiplash alternation between full-throated vows to join fellow Republicans in repealing the Affordable Care Act and noncommittal answers when asked specific questions by reporters has gone on for so long now that it risks becoming old hat–which would play right into Gardner’s hands, of course, in much the same way as Gardner deftly turned criticism over his flip-flops on abortion against his critics during the 2014 campaign. It’s an audacious strategy, but one Gardner successfully pulled off against Mark Udall. As Napoleon Bonaparte famously said, “in politics never retreat, never retract, never admit a mistake.”

If there is any lesson in politics that Cory Gardner has taken to heart, that’s it.

By never apologizing for or even explaining these obviously contradictory positions, Gardner is hoping to keep the media and the public guessing for as long as possible as this highly fractious debate proceeds. Gardner’s continued backing away from protecting Medicaid patients toward his new line about “protecting those who need it the most” remains the most important development here, signaling support for cuts he previously strongly implied he would oppose. The rest, as you can plainly see in the contradiction above, is filler.

Sen. Gardner’s more frank defenders call what he’s doing here “shrewd politics,” and assure us that once the matter is resolved one way or the other Gardner will be fine–and that by keeping out of the fray for as long as possible, he’ll even come out ahead politically.

Gardner’s plummeting approval ratings tell us it’s not working. And Napoleon analogies meet their end…at Waterloo.

Comments

16 thoughts on ““Corycare”—The Bizarre Two-Step Continues

  1. Why is it that Cory is the very last person on earth to know how Cory Gardner is going to vote here? . . . 

    . . . it's almost as if he never listened to himself at any of his town hall meetings.

    1. Thanks for a truly witty comment.  It's a political Haiku on many levels.  I needed something of wiry genius to put it all in perspective.  My comment would have been more along the lines of: "Chickenshit little coward".

  2. Words are fungible to Cory.  Most words can be masticated and spit out with little consequence to our junior senator.  He is very clear, however, on the word "dollar"….he seems not to forget nor confuse that one.

    Oh…He will vote “yes”….taking bets…giving odds.

    1. Of course, he will vote yes. The way to improve the healthare system is to increase the number of uninsured. The only way to protect Medicaid is to cut Medicaid. The only way to provide jobs for the middle class is to give tax cuts to the wealthy. The only way to feed the hungry is to cut food stamps, meals on wheels, and nutrition programs to schools. The only way to protect the environment is to get rid of the EPA. The only way to improve schools is to reduce their funding and give the money to churches. I could go on, but I suspect the inherent logic of all of this is lost on you.

      1. Didn't we read this in 1984.  Up is down and lies are truth.  The mystery is whether Cory Gardner is the Music Man and knows it's all bullshit or is he self-deluded and truly believes that we really need to destroy the village to save it.  Who the fuck knows at this point.  All we really know is that the little prick is an automatic YES.

  3. Dear God let McConnell bring it to a vote and our little Cory stand up and proudly vote his conscience in one career destroying moment.  He won't be able to weasel out of this vote.  It will be a stain on his record from the moment he casts it.  Democrats and Republicans are going to be salivating to run against him.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

203 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!