President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 31, 2009 10:24 PM UTC

Administrative incompetence hurts people

  • 9 Comments
  • by: DavidThi808

We all talk about Ritter’s political decisions sticking it to labor in favor of large companies with unionized workers. Most of us find his veto of unemployment for locked out workers anti-fairness. But at the end of the day it is a political decision and if he wants to make his political decisions as a tool of a segement of the business community, it is a legit choice for him to make.

But we also need to look at the job he is doing administering the state. Running the state, implementing the policy as set by the political decisions of the legislature and governor, is an a-political effort. I think we have strong concensus that the state should do it’s job effectively and efficiently.

And by this measure Governor Ritter is doing poorly. From the Denver Post we have:

Colorado’s most powerful charitable foundations have spent millions to feed hungry people this year – including money that could be funneled to other needs if state and county officials were able to get food stamps to the poor on time.

In this time of economic crisis we have the state unable to provided funded assistance to our poorest residents. And this includes federal funds that are available, except the state can’t deliver them.

But charities are stepping in to the void. So no harm right? Except for what we then lose:

The Denver Foundation has devoted $983,000 to food so far this year, up from $190,000 last year at this time. Grants that usually go to arts, schools, health care and the environment have been diverted to hunger relief.

So what’s the problem? The root issue appears to be some really badly designed software. We’re not talking sub-optimal here, we’re talking programmers who should never be allowed near a keyboard.

Counties also complained that CBMS is nonintuitive, that it takes 45 minutes to enter data for one application and that, when moving from one screen to the other, things like names and addresses have to be re-entered.

But not to worry, the Ritter Administration is stepping up to solve this issue:

Last fall, the state awarded a $90,000 contract to the system’s creator, Electronic Data Systems, to study how to simplify and quicken the program for counties and clients.

That’s right, they hired the same brain trust that delivered this piece of junk to figure out how to fix it. This is like hiring Geroge Bush to head up our efforts to improve other country’s opinion of the United States.

But there’s more:

A new $48.6 million four-year contract with Deloitte Consulting will include creating a Web-based application system in nine months, state officials say. … State officials also hope Deloitte can create a more facile application process within a year and a half.

That’s right, the state apparently needs 4 years, longer than it took Microsoft to create Windows 7, to “fix” this system. And what makes them think trying the same approach of a high priced consulting company on a multi-year contract is going to have a different outcome than their previous multi-year contract with a high priced consultant.

Now Evan Dryer says that the State is working to take care of this as well as possible.

“Can we do better? Yes. Is there a sense of urgency to remedy any shortcomings in the system? Absolutely.”

Except that is utter bullshit. (Note – Evan may very well not know this is bullshit.) The state has crappy software. One of the first steps you do in this case is look for alternatives. Preferably alternatives you can get off the shelf. But the State of Colorado will not look.

Reporting software is a component of a system like this. It’s a secondary component (not primary), but it is one of some import. For 2 years (35 times since 5/22/07) my company has tried to get Michael Locatis, the CIO for the State of Colorado, to have someone in his office take a look at our system.

This is not that they looked at it and we’re not a good fit – this is they have no interest in even seeing something new to determine if it could help. (This is not about my company, this is using my company as a concrete example of the Ritter administration’s unwillingness to look at better solutions.)

The root issue here is the state has serious software needs – food stamps, stimulus reporting, etc where people are being harmed and the state must return funds to the federal government. And what I think it is reasonable for us to expect from any administration, Republican or Democratic, is that they do this well. Not perfectly, but at least competently.

Everyone complains that Ritter avoids political decisions as long as possible. It appears that he is also avoiding taking proactive action in running the state too.

But don’t worry, Governor Ritter is going to host a free opportunity and help fair at the State Capitol on Tuesday afternoon for working families struggling to survive the economic downturn. That is as long as that help is not food stamps, stimulus funds, ar anything else that requires a working computer system…

How well is Bill Ritter running the state?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Comments

9 thoughts on “Administrative incompetence hurts people

      1. our software cost about 6 – 8K total. Looked at a lobbyist but even if successful, we would lose money on the deal.

        Maybe that’s why they go with the real expensive ones even if they can’t deliver. That does rule out most off the shelf solutions for the state as they are too cheap to make this route effective.

      2. Who gives a rip if they use our s/w. Even I don’t care that much because it’s not that much money.

        What does matter is their decision to only purchase expensive items via lobbyists means that people are not getting their foodstamps. That when charities pick up that slack, other items are not there for people.

        And this is all happening when we need these support systems in place for people who have lost jobs in the worst economic downturn since the great depression.

    1. That news is so tremendous! And this is all happening when we need these support systems in place for people who have lost jobs in the worst economic downturn since the great depression. But aside from that breaking information did you know that the Customers of Advanta have already had to deal with the fact that their credit lines will be frozen regardless of credit history in June.  However, Advanta, or Advanta Bank Corp. has a shipment of ivory backscratchers on back order and has moved up the freeze date to May 30th.  The company still needs some money now, and customers are expected to keep paying their balances.  On the bright side, they won’t be adding any new debt.  On the down side, they have to seek other options as a result of their accounts being frozen.  It looks like it will mean payday loans are in store for any customers left high and dry by Advanta.

  1. CBMS was forced on the counties by Gov. Owens.  They didn’t want it, but he insisted on having it implemented before a late implementation penalty kicked in.   (The more things change the more they stay the same.)  The state has been god awful at procuring software for decades.  Revenue spent $13 million in 1998 and got nothing.  They are spending $50 million now and getting a system from an Ausie company that is anything but intuitive.  But they have to do something before that system that started life while LBJ was president dies.

    1. That the state is incapable of doing better and we need to just accept the fact that it will always do a terrible job of bringing in software systems.

      I say we should not only expect but demand better from the state. And that demand must be on the Governor as he is the one we elect to run things.

      1. I used to work for the state many years ago David.  I will tell you they have the most arcane purchasing rules, and they make absolutely no sense whatsoever.  

        I can’t tell you how many times my department penny pinched throughout the year, and then went running around town like crazy idiots to buy computers and faxes, etc.

        at the end of the fiscal year (June 1).

        Just to let you know, I tried for a year and a half just to get Eco Passes for my department.  It eventually went to the Governor’s chief of staff, and they STILL DIDN’T GET APPROVED !  It was a most pathetic and frustrating experience, and I remind you this was for eco passes for Christ sakes.  Is there anything that makes more sense or that is less innocuous than Eco-passes ?  Sorry, we can’t do it, it just makes too much sense.

        You are right, the only way to get any better is from the Governor on down.  He could clean up a boatload of red tape if he really wanted to.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

216 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!