McInnis Silently Files For Governor's Race

Is It Possible

Could McInnis really be going through all of this brain damage because he wants to see Penry elected Governor?  Why else would he allow himself to be so sidetracked and derailed before he even begins running?  You'd think that a guy who served so many years in Congress would know how to announce a campaign, right?  

Sure seems to me that Penry benefits by watching all of the other GOP candidates totally screw the pooch in terms of announcing their campaigns.  The bar's been set pretty low.

---

by: TaxCheatGeithner @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 16:03:45 PM UTC

What an unbelievable train wreck

How long are we giving this abortion of a campaign? Weeks? That long? I can't believe that McInnis is the most experienced GOP politician in Colorado seeking office. This is a joke, I'm starting to wonder if the guy above who thinks he's killing himself for Penry's betterment is on to something.

Yo quiero gobierno medio!

---

by: JeffcoBlue @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 16:36:26 PM UTC

I'm only surprised at how quickly

McInnis has managed to begin committing hara kiri.

I've said before that the McInnis common wisdom was overblown. GOP primary voters admire and reward guys who can demonstrate some ruthlessness every now and then. Right now, it appears that Josh Penry is the one really calling the shots in the McInnis for Guv campaign. It won't go unnoticed by the grassroots and the kingmakers--not unless McInnis can step up and show he still knows how to knee-cap a guy.    

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

---

by: twas brillig @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 16:49:45 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Bizarre

Scott McInnis just snatched Bob Schaffer's brass-plated "Campaign Rollout Fiasco" trophy.

Backing into a statewide candidacy, and he can't even manage the Reverse gear very well?

Shamed into a candidacy by conservative blogs and a liberal legal group?

Clearly believing oneself entitled to run an entire state, but to embarrassed to make a public case for that belief?

No 'rogue staffers' in sight -- only oneself to blame?

Even the country club set has got to be scratching their heads by this point.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

---

by: twas brillig @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 16:40:47 PM UTC

The statewide GOP candidates do seem a mess

But I keep worrying about what happens if they ever do run people who are not self-destructive. I think McInnis would give the election to Ritter (as they compete to see who can pander more to the "business leaders" in the state).

But what if it's Penry? He appears to be able to run a competent campaign.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

---

by: DavidThi808 @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:00:07 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Either way

McInnis today has implicitly conceded that all the people bashing him for not filing his paperwork were right. And where there's smoke, there's fire. McInnis has now given credibility and substance to every CEW and ProgressNow hit that may be coming down the pike.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

---

by: twas brillig @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:14:15 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Speaking of Progressnow and Ethics Watch

Just got this a few seconds ago:

ProgressNow Colorado Congratulates Colorado Ethics Watch
Ethics watchdog group publicizes campaign law violations, forces "McLobbyist" to file

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
CONTACT: Michael Huttner at 303-931-4547

DENVER: After learning that former Congressman Scott "McLobbyist" McInnis silently filed papers to run for governor of Colorado yesterday, ending weeks of speculation and allegations of campaign finance law violations from both sides of the aisle, the founder of ProgressNow Colorado, the state's largest progressive advocacy organization Michael Huttner released the following statement:

"We were pleased to hear this morning that Scott 'McLobbyist' McInnis has decided to stop misleading the people of Colorado and start complying with the law. Republicans and Democrats have united in recent days to demand that McInnis stop playing games in order to avoid proper campaign finance disclosures.

"The credit for this goes first and foremost to Colorado Ethics Watch, who doggedly followed up on McInnis' many slip-ups and forced McInnis under threat of an embarrassing investigation to file his papers. Everyone who believes that no politician should be above the law owes Ethics Watch a debt of thanks for holding McInnis accountable."

###

Teamwork ka-pow! Good work guys, I signed your petition too.

Yo quiero gobierno medio!

---

by: JeffcoBlue @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:37:56 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Yep, kudos to CEW - good job

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

---

by: DavidThi808 @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 20:55:55 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

agreed, and i believe there should be a little

bit of an apology from people who have said things about CEW such as this...

"Of course, the real problem with this story is the association with Colo. Ethics Watch, a classic "cry wolf" organization with correspondingly low credibility.  Even if there is a wolf in this case, it's difficult to believe it because CEW misfires so much."

if i am counting correctly, CEW has been successful twice in 10 days in being a very effective organization. 1st - the ethics ruling against the IEC and now this with McInnis.

just sayin...

---

by: wade norris @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 21:12:05 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

But

they lost big time on the Coffman thing.

---

by: redstateblues @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 21:15:44 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

did they?

it looks to me that the IEC did something wrong or at least unethical in matters related to the case.

I would say that if the IEC had done what it is supposed to do, Coffman would have been censured.

how else could he get away with hiring the voting machine software vendor to run his campaign?

---

by: wade norris @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 21:31:06 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

hiring the voting machine software vendor to run his campaign

Wade, you may be right that the IEC fell short in its duties, but that's not remotely what Coffman did, or what Ethics Watch accused him of doing. Get your charges straight before flinging them around on a blog.

A leader on the battlefield can be a leader in Congress. -- redstateblues

---

by: RedGreen @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 21:47:54 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

I'm with Wade on this

God help me.

Which reminds me, I never got an answer from Dave in this thread after I challenged his repeated claim that CEW wasn't credible: http://coloradopols.com/showCo...

I think they've done a lot of good work. A recent example is that they stepped up to the plate in the Fort Collins election when Andrew Boucher shit the bed. They do a lot of work that doesn't get noticed outside of local boundaries.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

---

by: twas brillig @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 21:52:10 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Yes, they did

Coffman was cleared, and CEW isn't going to appeal. Whether or not the IEC was following the law, Coffman is still the winner, which makes CEW the de facto loser.

And considering the amount of time and energy they put into the case, I'd say that qualifies as losing big time.

---

by: redstateblues @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 22:01:00 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

It's only a matter of time

Until someone challenges the non-profit status of this organization with the IRS.  No complaint was filed as an example against Ritter lately for getting donations from lobbyist.

---

by: guesswho @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 22:37:46 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

I'm "evolving" my opinion of them

They've done good the last couple of times. I'm moving them over into the reputable column.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

---

by: DavidThi808 @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 03:11:18 AM UTC

[ Parent ]

Whatever

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

---

by: twas brillig @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 05:11:41 AM UTC

[ Parent ]

Would you prefer

I'm pond scum, how could I have ever doubted CEW in any way at any time?

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

---

by: DavidThi808 @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 12:40:21 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Whether you did or didn't

wasn't of consequence. Your inability to provide an explanation or rationale for the blanket claims you make is annoying. It had little to do with CEW.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

---

by: twas brillig @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 14:21:31 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

I think that's unfair

I provide links & details in a lot of my posts. But all of us make short comments because if we provide long details on all then the length here would explode.

I could make the same claim about your comment that was the single word "whatever." There was no explination or rationale provided with that comment.

As to CEW, they had a period where I thought they were making mountains out of molehills in a number of cases. Personal opinion.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

---

by: DavidThi808 @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 22:04:49 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

We'll see if Penry can run a campaign

He made a few enemies as minority leader and not everybody is as star-struck by the little prince as his adoring followers at home are.

Sometimes, I guess, you have to let the inner bitch out.

---

by: gertie97 @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:25:24 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Would a decent candidate please join the race?

I honestly cannot see myself voting for Ritter, McInnis, or Penry. Is this all the Dems and Repubs have got? Who are the Greens running for gov in 2010?

---

by: OneEyedOwl @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:34:00 PM UTC

I apologize on behalf of Dems.

Ritter apparently IS the best we're going to offer.  Sucks, I know.  About all I can say is he's good on green energy and OK on same gender couple equality issues. That beats any R in the mix.  Of course we all know that whoever the Greens are running, voting for that person in large numbers just gets us a conservative Limbaugh ring kissing R. So it goes... sigh...

---

by: BlueCat @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 15:35:34 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

maybe this is a public document so it doesn't matter,

but shouldn't McInnis' home address and personal email address be blacked out? Just for professional courtesy?

"If someone just sticks to shutting the fuck up, can they still go outside and play a game of hide and go fuck yourself?" -- Fidel's Dirt Nap

---

by: Raphael @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:37:55 PM UTC

We've done so

On our .gif image. We can't really do anything about the .PDF, which is also available from the Secretary of State of course. Call it a professional courtesy where available.

---

by: Colorado Pols @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:42:27 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Nicely done. n/t

"If someone just sticks to shutting the fuck up, can they still go outside and play a game of hide and go fuck yourself?" -- Fidel's Dirt Nap

---

by: Raphael @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 17:48:10 PM UTC

[ Parent ]

Crickets chirping

Anyone else notice the conspicuous absence of Hesse and his protoge (gopstudent) today?

Why aren't they presenting a spirited defense of their overlord on the blogs?

Could it be that they're as embarassed of Congressman McInnis' campaign as the rest of the Colorado GOP?

---

by: MesaModerate @ Wed May 20, 2009 at 23:10:49 PM UTC

Guess I should say it

This doesn't look very good for McInnis. I think Penry is going to be our nominee, and that's fine.

I enjoy Pols keeping everyone up to date on what's going on with our primary, it's too bad that Ritter is falling apart at the seams. Even you can't ignore it anymore, he doesn't have any friends left! Maybe you guys should switch sides before it's too late? There's room on the Penry hayride for you!! To our next Governor!

---

by: GOPwarrior @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 01:27:18 AM UTC

If it's ok with you...

...we'ld like to actually, you know, hold the election.

No trees were destroyed in the posting of this comment. But a large number of electrons were horribly inconvenienced.

---

by: DavidThi808 @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 03:12:11 AM UTC

[ Parent ]

How dare you suggest there is division in the beloved Grand Old Party!

Haven't you read your own posts?  

Maybe you guys should switch sides before it's too late?

Here's something to consider, should you be interested in foundation beyond rank speculation:

What is clear is that the Republican Party is facing formidable demographic challenges. Its constituents are aging and do not reflect the growing ethnic and racial diversity of the general public. As was the case at the beginning of this decade, Republicans are predominantly non-Hispanic whites (88%). Among Democrats, the proportion of non-Hispanic whites has declined from 64% in 2000 to 56%, as Latinos and people from other racial backgrounds have joined the ranks of the Democrats. At the same time, the average age of Republicans increased from 45.5 to 48.3, while the average age of Democrats has remained fairly stable. For the first time in at least two decades, Republicans are older than Democrats on average.

Republicans continue to be disproportionately comprised of Southerners (39%) and white evangelical Protestants (35%). However, these figures are largely unchanged from 2004 and up only slightly since 2000 as the GOP has lost supporters across all regions and religious groups.

http://pewresearch.org/pubs/12...  

"There are a lot of reasons not to elect me." Mitt Romney in a moment of clarity

"I'm Mitt Romney and yes, Wolf, that's also my first name," Willard Mitt Romney demonstrating 'policy flexibility.'  

---

by: ClubTwitty @ Thu May 21, 2009 at 14:56:59 PM UTC

[ Parent ]