President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 24, 2017 11:11 AM UTC

"Waffler Brauchler" Can't Take The Heat

  • 21 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
George Brauchler.

The Colorado Independent reports on the fallout from the passage this year of Senate Bill 17-267, the hard-fought compromise to save rural hospitals and give the state budget a small bit of breathing room through the reclassification of the state’s Hospital Provider Fee program to exempt it from revenue limits imposed by the 1992 Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR). Though the deal is done, among Republicans the finger-pointing continues:

In the days after the end of the latest legislative session, a narrative that emerged was one of bipartisanship and compromise.

But “compromise” can sometimes be a dirty word, especially when it comes to party primaries, plenty of which could take place in 2018. Some potential challenges follow a high-stakes deal lawmakers passed to reclassify the state’s hospital provider fee so it is exempt from the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, commonly known as TABOR…

Now, with the session over, election season soon begins. And one looming question will be whether TABOR hardliners will try to make those Republicans who voted for the plan pay for what they did.

The Colorado Union of Taxpayers, for one, has thrown down the gauntlet.

“As Rush Limbaugh said after Obamacare repeal passed, ‘there’s no reason to vote for Republicans,’ and that applies to the Colorado Republican Party as well,” CUT’s president, Greg Golyansky told The Colorado Independent.

We noted last week the Independence Institute’s Jon Caldara’s bitter denunciation of Republicans who supported the Hospital Provider Fee fix, calling out GOP leadership by name and claiming the deal is the “largest ‘grand betrayal’ from Republicans I have ever witnessed in my more than 25 years in Colorado politics.” Much like the aftermath of 2005’s bipartisan Referendum C campaign to give the state a “time out” from TABOR limits, Caldara finds himself not just on the losing side, but at odds with elected GOP leadership in Colorado.

With that said, Caldara’s rage does appear to have tripped up at least one Colorado Republican gubernatorial candidate, in a way eerily similar to how Referendum C caused terminal problems for GOP gubernatorial candidate Bob Beauprez in 2005-06:

One of the Republican candidates who said he would sign the law was Arapahoe County-area District Attorney George Brauchler. He would do it, he said that day, but grudgingly.

“I think the alternative is too devastating for the rural community and I think we’re sort of in a place now where we’ve got to take this the way it’s at,” he said. “My regret is that because of a lack of leadership and political pressure from an office that could have exerted both we’re at a place where we’re going to have to accept not the best outcome here. But I think we have to do it for rural Colorado and for that I support it.”

Post-Caldara freakout, George Brauchler has pulled a full-on “Both Ways Bob.”

UPDATE: Since this story was posted, 18th Judicial District Attorney George Brauchler, who is running for governor as a Republican, said after thinking about it more he would not have signed the law. He said he believes it is unconstitutional. He said he would find the money to save rural hospitals elsewhere in the budget. He said he was a reluctant supporter at best on the day the compromise passed. “Certainly I’ve changed my position on signing it, but the distance between those positions isn’t that dramatic,” he said. [Pols emphasis]

Wait a minute–the “distance” between taking action to prevent something “devastating for the rural community” and not taking that action…”isn’t that dramatic?” For the communities that could have seen their hospitals close, it would be pretty damned dramatic. Given what other Republicans have said about the urgency of the problem, like Sen. Jerry Sonnenberg, Brauchler’s dismissal of his own flip-flop on the Hospital Provider Fee fix is nonsensical in the extreme.

And he’s given his primary opponents the perfect wedge — one that GOP primary voters have smelled before.

Comments

21 thoughts on ““Waffler Brauchler” Can’t Take The Heat

  1. Principled politicians listen to stakeholders and are willing to admit when they're wrong. Thanks DA Brauchler for your honesty. It's more than we can expect from liberal smear campaigns.

      1. I'm sure that State Senator Jerry Sonnenberg (R-Sterling) will be ecstatic when he learns that some fool on Colorado Pols referred to him as a "liberal" (liberal smear campaign). 

    1. Where in the statement does Brauchler say anything about listening to someone, Moderatus?  In this case, it sounds like he's channeling his inner Trump, listening first to his own inner voices. Perhaps if we press him, he'll even tell us he is his own adviser, because he is so smart.

        1. Waiting for YOU to post something on the Manchester bombing. Oh, maybe you've decided not to since word got out today that US sources leaked information about the bomber that UK intelligence didn't want out. Why is it that after just 4 months in office, your boy Trump is running the leakiest administration in US history?

        2. Care to refute their argument? Or are you just going to dismiss and deflect? CPols made a claim, perhaps post hoc, ergo propter hoc, of flip-flopping for political purposes, and provided evidence, in the form of contradictory statements to back it up. What do you have in response?

          We all get better by raising the level of discourse beyond "Nuh-uh!" Let's give it a try. 

    1. They can't write about Manchester because they have to admit they are wrong about Islamic terror. It messes up their whole ideology.

      1. And Moldy.  What do you have to say about Trump leaking the terrorist's name to the press and potentially derailing their intelligence gathering efforts?   Oh look!!!  Now I got 3 things I can bug you about.   Come on.  Prove that you are thoughtful and intelligent.  Prove that you are not a traitor to our country and answer the questions.

      2. It is a long way from covering George Brauchler to terrorism in Manchester. But apparently, the attack did concentrate the conservative's attention – just as the terrorists hope.

        see: this article in The Atlantic especially the graphic comparison between the reality of the number of deaths versus the amount of coverage in even the liberal/MSM's New York Times.

        1. Six degrees of separation –  George Brauchler

          Here's the connection. If the attacker had survived, the Crown Prosecution Service was going to request that Brauchler travel to Manchester and be admitted to the British court pro hac vice so he prosecute the perpetrator and tweet during trial.

  2. Boy George should sit down with Both Ways Bob and Whory Gardner to get some tips on how to flip flop with grace and poise.

    With microphone in hand, maybe he’s warming up to do a rendition of Karma Chameleon.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

58 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!