President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
May 13, 2009 11:46 PM UTC

Colorado Pols Legislative Session Awards - Part Deuce

  • 13 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

You’ve seen the big awards in Part I, so now it’s on to the second and final half of the Colorado Pols Legislative Session Awards: 2009. Click below to read the results and offer your own input…

MR. IRRELEVANT

Republican Rep. Mark Waller

Here’s how we classify Mr. Irrelevant: You could have removed them from the session entirely and nobody would have known they were gone. This award comes from a combination of low profile, small workload, and relevance of legislation. In these criteria, Waller was 3-for-3.

Waller’s biggest contribution to the 2009 legislative session is because of who he isn’t, not who he is. Waller beat the infamous Doug Bruce in a Republican primary last summer, ridding the GOP of a humongous headache in the process. But as a legislator…well, let’s just say the other 99 members under the Golden Dome could have done just fine without him.

Waller was the sponsor of four bills in 2009, two of which had no co-sponsor in the Senate and thus never made it to the floor for a vote. He was listed as the sponsor on two other successful bills. but both had several other sponsors and neither were controversial pieces of legislation. It’s safe to say that the 2009 legislative session would have been virtually unchanged whether Waller was there or not-as long as it wasn’t Bruce who was there instead.

Waller’s campaign slogan may have been, “Colorado Can Count On Me,” but maybe he was talking about something else.

BEST FRESHMAN LEGISLATOR

TIE: Democratic Sen. Linda Newell and Democratic Rep. Sal Pace

We’ll be the first to admit that we had no idea who Linda Newell even was as recently as last September, which was when we first started hearing that she might be about to pull an upset over former Republican Rep. Lauri Clapp in the generally-Republican area south of Denver. But once she was in office, Newell performed well and was consistently mentioned as a savvy new senator.

In her first legislative session, Newell did a good job of representing her district and voting her conscience, rather than sticking to the party-line as most freshman in either caucus tend to do. She was one of five Democrats who voted against in-state tuition for illegal immigrants, for example, which made a lot of sense given that she doesn’t represent a district that is particularly friendly towards illegal immigrants in general.

As for Pace (a Pols’ reader favorite for Best Legislator) he wasted little time in making an impact in his first session; Pace introduced HB1317, which would bar the State Land Board from selling or leasing land to any federal agency for the purpose of expanding the Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site. The bill has been a hot topic recently, with Republicans like Scott McInnis, Rep. Doug Lamborn and others lobbying Ritter to veto the legislation.

BEST IN LEADERSHIP

New Senate Majority Leader John Morse

We’ve already written extensively about Morse, who was our Runner Up for “Best Legislator” in 2009. The new Senate Majority Leader showed his leadership chops in helping to push through the most significant piece of legislation of the session: SB228, which repealed the damaging Arveschoug-Bird Amendment. While not even officially in a top leadership position at the time, Morse showed great political courage by taking on an issue that may not be well-received when he runs for re-election in his Colorado Springs district in 2010.

WORST IN LEADERSHIP

Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry

Hey may go on to become governor, but Penry was an absolute disaster for Republicans (including many we’ve talked to) as Senate Minority Leader and official speaker on all things coming from the legislature. The GOP had no plan for the 2009 session aside from just opposing everything that Democrats proposed, and their lack of direction was more than obvious.

Penry also erred significantly in failing to quickly condemn harmful comments from Senators Dave Schultheis and Scott Renfroe; his refusal to condemn their remarks gave them more credence and added to a problematic image of Republicans as thoughtless, hateful ideologues. It is the job of those in leadership to make sure that their Party is seen in a positive light, and it was an absolute no-brainer for Penry to have come out and said something like, “Sen. Schultheis’ unfortunate comments do not reflect the views of the Republican Party.” Instead, his silence spoke volumes-both about what Republicans might really believe, and about his interest in preserving his political future with the influential El Paso conservative crowd over protecting his caucus as a whole.

DUMBEST LEGISLATION

HB-1152

There wasn’t an obvious winner this year as in year’s past, when we saw bills introduced to prohibit the placing of microchips in people’s brains. But a couple of bills did strike us as being particularly idiotic, such as HB-1152, sponsored by Republican Rep. Jerry Sonnenberg and co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Lois Tochtrop, which was killed in committee. BH-1152 dealt with horse racing, and its second major provision would allow this:

Historical horse racing, in which the patron wagers on the outcome of races previously held at licensed horse tracks and digitally recorded, but as to which identifying information has been deleted so that the patron must make the same type of judgment as to the likely winner as if the race had not yet been run.

Really? How would this be enforceable? How would you stop someone in another state from calling his buddy in Colorado with the results of the race, and then placing a huge bet on a guaranteed outcome? Didn’t Biff get rich doing this in “Back to the Future, Part 2”?

While they’re at it, the legislature should allow betting on all previously held sporting events. It would be a great way to help fix the economy if you could bet on the winner of last year’s Super Bowl.

WORST EMERGING TREND

Resigning Early from the Legislature

In the 2009 session, legislators resigned for various reasons. Whether taking a new appointment from President Obama (Sen. Peter Groff) or just plain retiring (Rep. Gwyn Green), there have been more vacancy committee meetings than months of the year thus far.

Some resignations were definitely worse than others, like the early departure of Rep. Anne McGihon, who was just re-elected last November. McGihon owed it to her constituents to at least stick it out for one term, rather than abruptly resigning early in the session. This trend highlights the need for higher salaries for legislators, because not only does the low $32,000 per year salary have many legislators always looking for another job, it also prevents many good possible replacements from even considering a run in a vacancy committee.

MOST LOVED AND HATED LEGISLATOR

Democratic State Sen. Morgan Carroll

This could be an annual award for Carroll, who is beloved by many for her principled stands on important issues but also loathed by others for refusing to even bend on some of those issues. We like Carroll because she is in the legislature for the right reasons-she really does want to make positive changes. But we do think she could stand to tone it down a notch from time to time.

Thoughts? Comments? Quibbles? Got your own suggested category? Comment below…

 

Comments

13 thoughts on “Colorado Pols Legislative Session Awards – Part Deuce

  1. For me the problem with Carroll isn’t so much her standing up for her principles, it is her complete inability to write legislation that makes sense and solves the problem she has identified.  As a case in point the yearly bills on condominium governance.  What she has done is just stupid.  All it really did was cost every homeowners’ association in the state legal fees to comply with it.  It didn’t do anything that the Colorado corporate code didn’t already require.  Her legislation on this topic was often inconsistent terminology wise with current statute causing interpretation problems and thus more legal fees.  And on top of all of this, I bet that she hasn’t started receiving fewer complaints.  She cost all of us in homeonwers’ associations money and didn’t solve the problem.  A hint, Sen. Carroll, repeal the mess you created and just prohibit Associations from filing a lien for fines it assesses.  Once that happens, Boards will have to look hard at whether they really want to collect fines or figure out some other way to get the matter solved.  Try it, you’ll like it. Way better than the crap that you translated into an impossible law that everyone ignores except the attorneys who want to charge out the wazoo for compliance.

  2. She voted against the pro-Israel resolution because she “didn’t believe in voting on foreign policy resolutions”, but be that as it may that the legislature is not Congress, you have to expect this in the Senate, and someone should have spoken with her earlier about the resolution tradition and process.

  3. …denying Pace glory with one hand and then giving the consolation prize with the other.  That’s so…uh….what’s the word…..political?

    🙂

      1. A TIE? Please. Pols doesn’t give him the runner-up best overall legislator award he deserves, and then makes it a tie for one he should win in a walk? No disrespect to Newell, who has a very tough row to hoe and has performed admirably, but this one should have gone to Pace. And while I personally love the Pinon Canyon legislation, it’s hardly his crowning achievement of the session. What about health care for the poor? Bringing Colorado Springs and Pueblo together on a water plan, of all things? And how about his constant fight for our civil rights on the Judiciary Cmte?

        Pols, you know I love you guys, but what do you have against my buddy? Did he stand your sister up for the prom or something? 😉

        Also, I leave for Belize tomorrow so I won’t be able to defend myself online. Polsters, please be gentle.

  4. service to country.  He’s an Army Reserve Colonel who has already served in Iraq three times, winning medals and high commendations (you’ll never hear about them from him) for his outstanding service, especially for his work with Iraqi/American interface issues.  

    He’s going back a fourth time at the request of a three star to help with the transition of responsibilities to the Iraqi military. That’s the difference between the Cheneys and Limbaughs of the world who swagger and blather about guts and patriotism and those who quietly live it.  

    1. Rep. Rice is a truly inspirational person. I may not always agree with him on policy, but rarely are there elected officials who go from a tough session straight to a warzone.

      There aren’t many people I look up to in politics, but he’s definitely someone I’ve been inspired by on more than one occasion.

      1. I don’t always agree with him on policy either but anyone who got a 100% on my scorecard would have zero chance of getting elected in my district.  Joe Rice is the only Dem ever to do it twice and the first in something like 35 years to represent HD38 at all. And his personal integrity is beyond reproach. He doesn’t do moderate just to get elected here. What you see is what you get.  

  5. Pols, come on.  Your obvious effort to constantly attack Penry should at least be backed up by facts.  No one was surprised that you were forced to post a second round of ratings just so you could beat up on Penry — but your rationale is just plain made up.  Penry DID condemn the remarks.  Take a minute to review this:

    http://www.9news.com/video/def

    You all are so full of shit.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

183 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!