Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

Stay Classy, Dave Schultheis (Redux)

by: Colorado Pols

Wed Feb 25, 2009 at 11:47:01 AM MST


UPDATE: Please, Sen. Schultheis, stop trying to explain yourself.

"What I'm hoping is that, yes, that person may have AIDS, [Pols emphasis] have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that," [Schultheis] said. "The family will see the negative consequences of that promiscuity and it may make a number of people over the coming years begin to realize that there are negative consequences and maybe they should adjust their behavior."

He...hopes "that person may have AIDS?" We have no words, folks. We're not sure we've seen anything quite like this before. It's scarcely believable that something so heinous would come out of the mouth of an elected official--we've gone back at least twice now, just to be sure this is really what we just read.

UPDATE #2: Perhaps the only thing more unsettling about this situation than what Schultheis said is Minority Leader Josh Penry's indifference. Rocky:

Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry said he's not going to muzzle his caucus.

"People are entitled to their opinions," the Grand Junction Republican said. "It's not my job to go around and censure people and tell them what to say."

He added that he thought Democrats were trying to "gin up the outrage machine" and said their hands aren't clean when it comes to questionable comments...

How tone-deaf can Penry possibly be? When one of your Senators says that he hopes babies get AIDS, the response one can reasonably expect is not an "outrage machine." It's just outrage.

And saying that "Democrats hands aren't clean" when it comes to questionable quotes? This isn't a partisan issue--this is a stupid, horrible, insensitive thing to say, and if Penry had any idea what he was doing in his 'leadership' position, he would say as much unequivocally.

--

The Rocky's "Live from the Legislature" blog relays the latest shame:

A Republican lawmaker voted "no" against a bill that requires pregnant women be tested for HIV. His remarks outraged some Democrats.

"We do things continually to remove the consequences of poor behavior," said Sen. Dave Schultheis, R-Colorado Springs, who also talked about "sexual promiscuity."

Sen. Lois Tochtrop, D-Adams County, a nurse, pointed out that people get AIDS from blood transfusions, also. The tests are to help prevent the transfer of HIV from an infected mother to her baby...

Afterward, Sen. Jennifer Veiga, D-Denver, said she was upset that Republicans - particularly those in leadership - didn't protest his comments. She said Schultheis' comments are "a thing of the 70s."

She complained to the Senate minority leader Josh Penry, R-Grand Junction, who later pointed out he co-sponsored the bill. He said he wasn't going to start censuring his members. [Pols emphasis]

Awesome, Josh Penry, just let your out-of-control subordinates go on with their bad selves--they're doing such a terrific job embarrassing you and your entire caucus every time they open their mouths, after all! Ignoring them while they witlessly sabotage your message and alienate sane people everywhere...well, it's not exactly what we'd call "leadership," but the Democrats will definitely take it.

Colorado Pols :: Stay Classy, Dave Schultheis (Redux)
Tags: (All Tags)

Share this post:

That would be the 1870's
Renfroe and now Schultheis (yet again).

Hey, these two clowns are getting plenty of attention. Kevin Lundberg must be getting restless! Can't wait.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  


Nanny state Dems want to control our lives
They're so smart. After all, they're legislators, people who don't have anything better to do.

I have mixed feelings about testing pregnant women for AIDS. Why not means test them to see if they can afford the kids? Education test them to see if they're baby ready? Opinion test them to make sure they'll bring up good little socialists?


[ Parent ]
You're absolutely right
No good to society can come from testing for a deadly disease in pregnancy. How nannyish! Let's do away with this and all other public health items.

Nice class warfare you're engaging in, btw.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP


[ Parent ]
Nice try, genius
Once again, you are fact-deprived. Schultheis was the only Republican who voted against it (even Lundberg voted for it!). Hence, there was broad bipartisan support. The rest of your gibberish merits no comment.

New material, please.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  


[ Parent ]
Sounds like sweeping bi-partisan support for Penry's HIV testing bill
I do think that Sen. Dave is probably hoping the Rocky doesn't put him on the front page tomorrow. Seriously, having a serious case of AIDS is a more serious outcome then just being tested HIV+. At the end of they day they have both been seriously proven to usually result in well, serious death.

On to the next issue. With all the drug testing required for new employees, I am just wondering about drug testing for the unemployment check. Not necessarily physical testing, but a verbal that they off the bugger sugar, horse, pipe, meth, etc.

If we are requiring the unemployed to verify they are searching for work and employable, shouldn't we also verify they are won't DQ themselves and be back in line for unemployment.

I know the arguments ... not all employers require a drug test, etc.. But in a concern for public health and as a deterrence measure to illegal drug use this might have some upside.

Obviously the social benefits of this would far outweigh the small cost to the state to make this little system change in their processes. Heck those that fail would likely make up all the implementation costs.


[ Parent ]
I will not stop
 ,until I am able to tell you how your shoes must match your belt and how your pants must be creased. That is my goal.

[ Parent ]
Typical...
don't abort the fetus, let it be born HIV+ (even though given treatment, this can be prevented) and die a slow, painful death as punishment for its Mom's alleged "promiscuity".

What a good "Christian" attitude!

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


[ Parent ]
You are correct Arvy
Schulties is way off base with this one.  One of the pro-life arguments is that it isn't right to punish a child (through abortion) for the "mistake" of the parent/mother.  If that is the case, why in the hell would we not want to test for HIV and prevent it, thus allowing the child that the mother is choosing to keep to be healthy, because it is more important to make the mother feel bad?

Senator Dave Schulties does not represent my conservative values.  He needs to apologize and withdraw his statement.


[ Parent ]
Opt-out
The bill has an opt-out provision for any woman who does not want to be tested.  The bill says they have to be tested unless they opt-out.  Besides, the blood is being drawn anyway, the law requires testing for syphilis.

I'm not a doctor, but I understand that the transmission of HIV to the baby can be prevented with modern medical interventions.  Seems like making an informed choice about getting tested is not much of imposition.


[ Parent ]
Presumably when you make that argument you say
that you certainly hope that none of their babies have AIDS and that you truth mothers to do the right thing, not that you hope babies die.

[ Parent ]
AS, you, sir, are an ass
The reason to do AIDS testing on pregnant women is that you can cut the incidence of AIDS in their baby by a factor of 10 or more if you detect it before the baby is born.  I'm hoping you are just ignorant of this fact.  If not, my opionion of you just dropped many more notches.

From http://www.avert.org/pregnancy...

Can HIV be transmitted from a mother to her baby?

An HIV positive woman can transmit the virus to her baby during pregnancy, labour and delivery, and through breastfeeding. If she takes no preventive drugs and breastfeeds then the chance of her baby becoming infected is around 20-45%.

Can this risk be reduced?

Modern drugs are highly effective at preventing HIV transmission during pregnancy, labour and delivery. When combined with other interventions, including formula feeding, a complete course of treatment can cut the risk of transmission to below 2%. Even where resources are limited, a single dose of medicine given to mother and baby can cut the risk in half. AVERT is currently running a campaign to ensure that all women have access to these drugs.  


[ Parent ]
Nice reply, GP


Exercise your right to peaceably assemble and reclaim the commons. Stop the militarization of America.

[ Parent ]
After reading comments here and at the Rocky, I support the bill
My gut reaction was negative but after thinking about it some more, I can see that testing makes sense even though it's probable that only a tiny percentage of women would test positive.

If a woman can opt out after being informed of the conditions that might infect her are explained, I'm ok with the tests. I assume the patient or insurer pays for the tests?

Women who would opt out most likely would be those who trust their partners were faithful and not johns or otherwise betraying them. They would be people who hadn't had blood transfusions, and they would be people who hadn't played around themselves.

And some people who knew they were likely AIDS carriers might opt out because they were in denial or otherwise mentally ill.


[ Parent ]
See, AS...
That's the value in knowing what the hell you're talking about.

So, why don't you now address the issue... which is not the bill but what Shultheis has to say about it.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP


[ Parent ]
See, AS...
That's the value in knowing what the hell you're talking about.

So, why don't you now address the issue... which is not the bill but what Shultheis has to say about it.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP


[ Parent ]
Aristotle, someday you gotta stop
double-posting. I mean once is an honest mistake, but this is ridiculous.  

"Have a Bobby bar! My dad made them." --Jon Huntsman Jr.

[ Parent ]
Yeah...
it's getting ridiculous...

[ Parent ]
Yeah...
it's getting ridiculous...

[ Parent ]
Yeah...
it's getting ridiculous...

[ Parent ]
LOL!
Sxp, it's my stupid mouse. It just likes to interpret single clicks as double clicks sometimes. I know I need a new one but that's not a priority right now...

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
OK, I retract my statement
I appreciate that you can change your position when you find out more facts.  If only more people would do that (on both sides of the aisle)...

[ Parent ]
It is not just Schultheis!
The entire group of State Senate Republicans (with the possible exception of Al White) are about as far right wing as you can get. The people of Colorado should be ashamed and embarrassed of them. They offer no solutions but sure do talk a lot.  

Let me check with Dick on that...
If Scott Renfroe or Dave Schulteis say something that is completely ignorant or unacceptable to the majority of Coloradans, but acceptable to Dick Wadhams and Jon Caldera, then it's OK with Josh Penry.

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead". - Thomas Paine

[ Parent ]
If you can't say it right, say nothing at all
Jail the politically incorrect.

[ Parent ]
Ridicule the dumb bunnies for living in the stone age
you are confusing politically incorrect with downright stupid Skeptic.

"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead". - Thomas Paine

[ Parent ]
Anyone have...
Keith Olbermann's e-mail? Surely one of these clowns qualifies for "Worst Person In the World"...

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  

Here you go:
Countdown@msnbc.com

[ Parent ]
Paging the Dem Senate Majority Fund (or whatever it's called)
You ARE capturing this craziness on video and audiotape, yes? Can't wait to see campaign season 2010.

Why is your senator so obsessed with AIDS?
Republicans can come back with a charge that the Dems are Nanny State Dems who want to control your toilet habits.

[ Parent ]
good luck with that
I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about but I wish you nothing but the best with your efforts at messaging in 20101. Seriously, this is great stuff. Keep it coming!

[ Parent ]
Why not ask
A more accurate question that fits reality, "Why is your senator trying to protect babies?"

Which begs the question, AS, why do you hate babies? Or, are you some kind of moron?

Just asking.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  


[ Parent ]
Oh yes, please do make that the cornerstone of the Republican campaign in 2010!
Vote for the GOP in 2010! We're not "nannies." Instead, we actually HOPE that babies will DIE OF AIDS so that their mothers will feel guilty!

THAT'S change we can BELIEVE in! Vote Republican!

(Sen. Dave Schultheis' actual quote: "What I'm hoping is that yes, that person may have AIDS, have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that."

Actual quote.

"Why not do the right thing for the American people, even though it's not exactly what we want." - Speaker Boehner


[ Parent ]
Has anybody
heard seen audio of the "What I'm hoping is that yes, that person may have AIDS" quote anywhere? Or even better, video?

Just...wow.


[ Parent ]
Will Michelle Malkin
next claim that Penry, Renfroe and Schultheis are deep cover Democratic plants meant to embarrass the Republican Party?  Wasn't that her answer for Swastika guy?  

Anyone call up Penry for inconsistency
He said he wasn't going to start censuring his members.

Didn't they give Marostica a major spanking for badmouthing Jon Caldera? So it looks like speaking truthfully about Caldera is worse than Schultheis' comments.

Got it.

Where all the cool kids will be on Saturday - Code War!


That was different
He was taken to the woodshed, not censured. ;)

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
There's another difference
Penry disagreed with Marostica. By doing nothing about Renfroe and Schultheis, he must agree with them.

Sometimes, I guess, you have to let the inner bitch out.


[ Parent ]
Strange contradiction
The democrat lawmakers are concerned about the health of unborn babies.  But it's ok to kill them.  

The unborn can't die - they're not alive if they're not viable outside the womb
That was easy. Next!

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
more
check out Arvadonian's comment above. This is a great example of the conservative ideal that life begins at conception and ends at birth.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
How clueless art thou?
Let me count the ways....

Let's bring a little ordered reason to the table, shall we? In any issue, the first step is to identify all relevant interests, including the interests of the state (which include protecting the interests of all others involved, in some balanced and welfare-optimizing way). Some of the interests easily identified here are the interests of the parents, of the fetus, and of the tax-payers and/or private health insurance payers who will share a part of the burden of future health care for the baby born with HIV-AIDS.

If you continue down this path of reason (undoubtedly, "the road less traveled" for some), you will see that many interests are involved, not merely those of the fetus.

The issue of abortion is one issue, and the issue of screening for HIV infection is another. I recognize the difficulty of finding space in which to separate such conceptually distinct issues in a mind that is either too small to make such accomodations, or simply too crowded with useful information. But finding or making the space not only is worth the effort, but is a prerequisite to making intelligent commentary.

We're all in this story together: Let's make sure that we write it well.
http://www.steveharveyforcolor...


[ Parent ]
Actually...
the concern is for the health of the baby when it is born.  That is the purpose of the tesing of the Mom-to-be for HIV.

How on earth can anyone oppose this with a clear concience?

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


[ Parent ]
I don't think many people oppose it
I was just pointing out the glaring contradiction that the democrats think it is ok to kill the baby before he is born, but they are concerned about preventing diseases in babies before they are born.  

[ Parent ]
pre-natal care
We also support pre-natal care for the working poor, which Republicans vehemently oppose at every turn. So there's plenty of "contradictions" to go around Mr. Jordan.


[ Parent ]
No contradiction at all.
I'm 100% pro-choice.  I think a woman should certainly have the right to choose to terminate her own pregnancy without seeking permission from some government bureaucrat, elected official or non-elected judge.  

If the woman decides to carry her pregnancy to term, then I'd like to see everything possible done to ensure that the baby is  born healthy.

You may be correct that not many people oppose it but one of our State Senators does.  Guess that shows just how out of touch he is.  

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


[ Parent ]
no contradiction
An unformed zygote is not a baby. But don't let the facts get in the way of your hysterics.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
Robert
You're reading too many of your own party's bullshit talking points.

Choice isn't about killing babies.  It's about the government not inserting itself between a woman and her doctor.

I see no double standard here.

Today, you're either going to get better or you're going to get worse, but you're never going to be the same.  Which one will it be?  --Joseph V. Paterno


[ Parent ]
good point
Nanny state-ism is OKIYAR.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

[ Parent ]
also it's up on politicalwire:
http://www.politicalwire.com/

oh the shame for colorado


[ Parent ]
The ultimate utilitarian argument
"What I'm hoping is that, yes, that person may have AIDS, have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that."

In recent years, the Religious Right has tried to attack "utilitarianism" as some sort of Nazi-esque ideology, without really understanding it.

But suffice to say, David Schultheis seems to be employing the most ultimate "utilitarian" argument ever: It is preferable to doom an innocent human life to teach a "moral" lesson to others.

Maybe that's what he's meant by opposing communicable disease immunization for children of undocumented immigrants and emergency contraception for sexually-assaulted women.

I'm sure Another Skeptic will now denounce Schultheis for "nannyism."  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  


It is only Utilitarian
If it works. And there is little reason to think his proposal, even if you ignore the ethical qualms under other analyses, would actually produce a better communal outcome. And my primary critique of Schultheis here is that he doesn't understand human nature, leading to his faulty argument.

He is laying out a case assuming that everyone (but himself) is rational and thus they actively and fully take consequences into account when making decisions. This is the same principle that leads to abstinence-only education because promoting condom use or HPV vaccines would remove consequences for the actions they oppose.

But people are not rational in the economic definition, not purely so anyhow. There are limits to the information considers actively when making a decision. Since people frequently ignore the risk of STIs when making decisions about sex, making sure the consequences remains is ineffective, and thus NOT utilitarian.

Of course, Schultheis was also worried about women lying about being raped, despite the legal penalties that would involve, in order to get emergency contraception, so perhaps we should consider this latest act a sign of improvement.

"One of the marks of a certain type of bad man is that he cannot give up a thing himself without wanting everyone else to give it up." - C.S. Lewis


[ Parent ]
Well said.
You nailed it.

"Why not do the right thing for the American people, even though it's not exactly what we want." - Speaker Boehner

[ Parent ]
Schultheis could be onto something.
Perhaps we should stop treating lung cancer if the person who has it smoked or was ever exposed to second hand smoke...the disease is a result of natural consequences; Same with heart disease or diabetes for anyone who has eaten fast foods.

If a child is born with Downs' Syndrome and the mother is over age 40, then the child should not receive any treatment because there is a causal link between the age of a mother and a child who is born with Downs'.  

In each of these situations, the person should feel guilty and their affliction should be published in the newspaper and perhaps 9News could do a nightly feature on these unfortunate idiots who are being justly punished for not "living right" and they could serve as a warning to the rest of us to "get right" in the way we are living our lives.  

Now really, who is advocating the Nanny State?

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


Keep it up
Schultheis' comment was the most awful thing I have ever heard. And the Republicans who don't immediately denounce it are the most politically tone deaf people ever.

""What I'm hoping is that yes, that person may have AIDS, have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that." - Dave Schultheis.

"Why not do the right thing for the American people, even though it's not exactly what we want." - Speaker Boehner


[ Parent ]
Keep it up, GOP
Let shit like this slide and watch more "safe" GOP seats go to Dems. Watch as you ensure Democratic hegemony for the next 20 years by displaying the ignorance and idiocy that lurks under all your social policies. Good going.

"Thank you for putting your rank political motives on display." - ArapaGOP

As for the outrage machine
I don't think it's even had time to get caught up on this one. Rather, it seems that the outrage is ahead of the curve.

Senator Penry, y'all have got problems. And it's the kind solved by first looking in the mirror. Not scapegoating others. Sheesh.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  


I think medical care generally is a waste of money
The Bible says you can be healed, even from death, if Jesus wants you to be. And Jesus likes most people, right? He's a friendly guy.

So if you're dying, it's probably because you've offended God. In which case, you totally deserve it. You socialist.

[/Right wing douche]

"Have a Bobby bar! My dad made them." --Jon Huntsman Jr.


Yes, those babies deserved it.
We shouldn't lift a finger to protect them.

"What I'm hoping is that yes, that person may have AIDS, have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that." - David Schultheis

Un-freaking-believable. I hope someone is praying for Dave Schultheis and whatever passes for his soul.

"Why not do the right thing for the American people, even though it's not exactly what we want." - Speaker Boehner


[ Parent ]
Man, am I ginned up now
...this asshole's commentary has driven me to Tanqueray........yet my outrage machine is not yet sated.

To say he hoped children would contract AIDS in order to punish their parents?  This is not human.  

Bartender!

I'm not as sweet as I used to be.


Schulteis can not stay classy if he never had any.
Definitely one of the biggest jerks in the lege.

"Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth." Paul Krugman, 9/2010

WIth Schultheis it should be "stay assy"


"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  

[ Parent ]
Certainly qualifies for being an ass......


"Politics determines who has the power, not who has the truth." Paul Krugman, 9/2010

[ Parent ]
this thread belongs at Square State, not here.


Why
The hell is that? You sure have been a pot of "nothing to see here" lately.

Yo quiero gobierno medio!

[ Parent ]
I feel another one
of the Barron's "my religion says x" missives coming.  

"At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid." - Nietzsche  

[ Parent ]
Um, why?
He's a Colorado legislator who voted against everyone else in his own party and who actually said:

"What I'm hoping is that yes, that person may have AIDS, have it seriously as a baby and when they grow up, but the mother will begin to feel guilt as a result of that."

Is that not appropriate for local comment?

Or are you so deeply, deeply ashamed at your own party's total spinelessness in not immediately denouncing this blackhearted dunce that you just want to wish it all away?

"Why not do the right thing for the American people, even though it's not exactly what we want." - Speaker Boehner


[ Parent ]
Barron X is not a Republican


[ Parent ]
From the Land of Lunatics...
C'mon, guys & gals, make an effort to understand the political dynamics here! Renfroe suddenly becomes the #1 right wing crazy in the state senate-and this is absolutely unacceptable to us in Colorado Springs, who believe that our senators/representatives are the only folks nutty enough for that role.  Absent Douglas Bruce, Dave Schultheis bravely stepped up to the plate and, metaphorically, put it 30 rows up in the center field stands!! Awwwwright!! Match that, you weak-kneed wingnuts from the north!! Go ahead-we're waiting!! But you know, and we know, that no one can out-looney the Schultster!!!  He da man!!

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?







Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 7 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search



Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >













RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols Penalty Box



Yard Signs!



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Business Word

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate Dems

Colorado Senate GOP

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

eleXn

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat


Colorado Pols is wholly owned by Colorado Pols, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com

Powered by: SoapBlox