President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 05, 2016 11:35 AM UTC

Get More Smarter on Friday (August 5)

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Get More SmarterThe Summer Olympics in Rio are already underway, with the Opening Ceremonies scheduled to take place tonightIt’s time to Get More Smarter with Colorado Pols. If you think we missed something important, please include the link in the comments below (here’s a good example). If you are more of a visual learner, check out The Get More Smarter Show.

TOP OF MIND TODAY…

► Congressman Mike Coffman (R-Aurora) imploded in spectacular fashion on Thursday, making a ham-handed attempt to explain that he isn’t a huge fan of Donald Trump before inexplicably backpedaling and making it (un)clear that he might still vote for Trump or might also support Libertarian Gary Johnson for President.

Marshall Zelinger caught up with Coffman and found him to be…confused on how to respond to his own TV ad. From Denver7:

The ad doesn’t reveal who he currently plans to vote for on Nov. 8.

“Do people ask you, ‘Are you going to vote for Trump?'” asked Denver7 political reporter Marshall Zelinger.

“I’m running my own campaign, and the purpose of the ad is not whether I’m voting for Trump or not, the purpose of this ad is to send a message to the people of my Congressional District that I will represent them whoever is in the White House,” said Coffman.

“They’re going to want to know, who are you going to vote for based on not liking either?” said Zelinger.

“Donald Trump has not earned my support. I’m not going to vote for Hillary Clinton. (I’ve) talked to Governor (Bill) Weld on the Libertarian side, and I wouldn’t rule that out,” said Coffman.

This is an absolute disaster for Coffman, who hoped to distance himself from Trump but ended up instead looking like a spineless fool who can’t even stick to one simple answer. Negative TV ads about this episode will be devastating for Coffman as we enter the final months of the fall campaign.

 

► Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump is hoping for an end to what has been the worst week of his campaign thus far. A new McClatchy-Marist poll released late Thursday shows Democrat Hillary Clinton surging to a 15-point lead in the race for President:

Clinton not only went up, but Trump went down. Clinton now has a 48-33 lead, a huge turnaround from her narrow 42-39 advantage last momth.

The findings are particularly significant because the poll was taken after both political conventions ended, and as Trump engaged in a war of words with the parents of Army Capt. Humayun Khan, killed in the Iraq War 12 years ago.

Trump’s terrible week, coupled with Clinton’s surge, has opened up new opportunities for the Democratic nominee to court disillusioned Republican voters.

 

► Pundits may disagree on whether or not Colorado is still a swing state this Presidential election, but that isn’t stopping the campaigns from making regular visits to our state. Donald Trump will be back in Colorado on Tuesday, less than a week after his running mate, Mike Pence, visited Denver and Colorado Springs (Democrats Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine were in Colorado on Wednesday as well). Trump will reportedly make stops in Grand Junction and Pueblo (Trump will not visit Pueblo after all).

 

Get even more smarter after the jump…

IN CASE YOU ARE STANDING NEAR A WATER COOLER…

► Senator Michael Bennet (D-Denver) was once considered the most vulnerable incumbent Democrat running for re-election this fall.

Now?

Republican Darryl Glenn is universally considered to be such a weak opponent that national pundits are calling Colorado’s Senate seat “Safe Democratic.”

 

► Fundraising numbers for state legislative races are overwhelmingly positive for Democrats. Of the Top 20 campaigns with the most cash-on-hand in State House races, 18 are Democrats. Things aren’t much better for Republicans in State Senate battles.

 

► As if things weren’t bad enough for Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Aurora)…Conservative radio hosts are now blasting Coffman for helping Hillary Clinton because of his wavering criticisms of Donald Trump.

 

► Trump is admitting that he did not, in fact, witness a video (which doesn’t exist anyway) of a $400 million cash delivery that the United States made to Iran.

 

► John Frank of the Denver Post tries to unpack the abortion stances of Republican Senate candidate Darryl Glenn:

The state’s largest anti-abortion organization, Colorado Right to Life, accused him of “trying to play a little bit of political maneuvering” for his answer to a recent question on personhood, reports The Durango Herald.

But days later, National Right to Life, the affiliate of Colorado Citizens for Life, came to his defense. The group endorsed Glenn on Tuesday, a day after the Herald story. “Darryl Glenn has been thoroughly vetted on this,” a spokeswoman, Tatiana Bergum, told the newspaper in a subsequent article. “He may not eloquently talk about it, but he is pro-life.”

The reason for the kerfuffle: a statement Glenn made July 15 on Colorado Public Television when asked about personhood, an effort to ban abortion and assign rights to fetuses.

 

► Proponents of a ballot measure to legalize new end-of-life options for the terminally ill in Colorado appear to have gathered enough signatures for the November ballot.

 

► If you are trying to gather signatures for a ballot measure this month, you would be wise to avoid standing outside a Wal-Mart in Colorado Springs.

 

► The Gold King Mine spill that made headlines last August does not appear to have done any lasting economic damage to Southwestern Colorado.

 

OTHER LINKS YOU SHOULD CLICK

 

► Republican insiders continue their calls for Donald Trump to drop out of the race for President; despite Trump’s bad week, there has been no indication that His Hairness would even consider ending his campaign.

 

Natural gas wells continue to decline in Western Colorado…but not because of any so-called burdensome regulations.

ICYMI

► The Get More Smarter Show took a brief summer break, but we’re back with a new episode that features an exclusive interview with state Sen. Morgan Carroll, the Democratic candidate for Congress in CO-6.

 

Get More Smarter by liking Colorado Pols on Facebook!

Comments

7 thoughts on “Get More Smarter on Friday (August 5)

  1. Should Dems throw a well-intentioned life vest to Self-destructing Republicans?

    Hell no!

    There already is a strong undertow pulling HRC toward "reaching out" to the GOP, toward governing from "the middle," and toward not accelerating the now-rapid descent of the Republican Party into the final madness of the prion disease it has welcomed so warmly into itself ever since the late 1970s. Ryan Lizza of The New Yorker even posited that, as a gesture of good faith, HRC should allow the Republicans to pick a Supreme Court justice, a stratagem that has been proven to work only on The West Wing, which was not a documentary series.

    Professor Krugman has knocked down most of the arguments in favor of this rainbows-and-unicorns idea. First of all, it's insane politics. It will divide the Democratic Party just as the Republicans are engaging in what is bound to be an entertaining interlude of public fratricide.

    Second, it would be an act of astonishing bad faith that would set in concrete all of the most unflattering opinions held about HRC by the people who trust her the least.

    Third, it assumes Democratic control of the Congress, which remains a long shot. As long as the Republicans still hold the House of Representatives, where all the bills involving federal spending are born, and assuming that the Democrats aren't gifted with a supermajority in the Senate, it's logical to expect that the GOP won't be any more willing to cooperate with a President Clinton II in governing the country than they were with either President Clinton I or Barack Obama.

    And, finally, and this is something Professor Krugman touches on only briefly, there is a more important reason for a President HRC to press her advantages on all fronts to put in place the policies she committed herself to run on: For the good of the nation, the Republican Party as it is presently constituted has to die.

    1. I think the number of people who give a crap what Lieberman thinks is about equal to the number who give a crap what Chachi thinks. HRC  is only inviting Rs who are terrified of Trump to consider voting for her even though they disagree with her because she's not… you know… ignorant and nuts. She isn't offering to change the stands she's taken along with Bernie and has called for a progressive DNC Chair. Read Bernie's op-ed.

      http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-sanders-message-20160805-snap-story.html

  2. While for Trump, this may be a worse week than his last worst week, I'm confident he'll find a way to produce a worse worst week, until finally, he simply becomes wurst 😉

  3. There is some amount of validity and accuracy to the Esquire article. But it does seem like Zappy has been drinking some left-over kool-aid from Jonestown; addling his brain and seeing a conspiracy under every bed. 

  4. Losing the election could be the easy part for Trump. Remember Judge Curiel? Trump said Curiel could not be objective towards Trump because "He's of Mexican heritage, I'm building a wall. It's an inherent conflict of interest."

    Right after the election in November, Trump will face RICO racketeering charges for all of the class action plaintiffs defrauded by Trump University- in Curiel’s courtroom. Trump could either go to trial or settle (for three times the tuition paid) at that point.

    So perhaps there's a good reason he's fundraising so hard even though his chances of winning are not great. He may need the money.

    1. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that he's negotiating with Reince Prebus and Sheldon Adelson. In exchange for receiving enough money to pay a negotiated settlement with the plaintiffs, he withdraws from the ticket, Pence is nominated for president and Newt gets the VP slot.

       

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

205 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!