Notable Links



Denver Internet Marketing by Parallel Path

Knowledge Messenger

Arvada Boutique Clothing Store Stella B's

"Pulpit Freedom Sunday" To Unseal God's Endorsement

by: Colorado Pols

Fri Sep 26, 2008 at 07:26:11 AM MDT


As the Colorado Springs Gazette reports:

The Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative advocacy group co-founded by Focus on the Family Chairman James Dobson, wants pastors to talk politics from the pulpit on Sunday, challenging Internal Revenue Service regulations prohibiting houses of worship from mixing politics and religion.

The group is spearheading "Pulpit Freedom Sunday" by encouraging church leaders to talk about whom they'll vote for in this year's election, and why - even if doing so violates IRS rules that grant tax-exempt status to churches. Group officials said they hope the action will trigger an IRS investigation that they can use as a springboard to challenge the IRS and the regulation in court.

"It is the job of the church and pastor to decide whether they should talk about political issues from the pulpit," said Erik Stanley, the group's senior legal counsel. "It is not appropriate for the government to draw that line."

About 30 worship centers nationwide have committed to "Pulpit Freedom Sunday," but no Colorado churches agreed to take part. Stanley said the number of participating churches, all of which risk losing their tax-exempt status, was limited intentionally to better manage litigation.

The group's protest centers on a 1954 amendment to the tax code that prohibits 501(c)3 nonprofits, which include religious organizations, from endorsing political candidates...

If Sarah Palin's nomination wasn't enough to cajole religious voters back into the GOP fold, this should take care of it: after all, it's a lot easier to "hold your nose and vote" when the consequences of failing to do so include going to Hell. A poll follows.

Colorado Pols :: "Pulpit Freedom Sunday" To Unseal God's Endorsement
Poll
Should churches endorse political candidates?
Yes
No
Sure, as long as they're not Islamofascists
Did we die and wake up in medieval Europe?
Not sure/other

Results

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If the IRS...
didn't go after Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, they are not going to go after any other right wing churches.

Nope.  They instead go after left-leaning churches (like my own denomination The United Church of Christ when we have member Barack Obama give a non-political speech at our national synod--and All Saints Episcopal Church in Pasadena, CA after the Pastor there delivered an anti-war sermon in 2004).

Links:
UCC:
http://wcbstv.com/campaign08/b...

Episcopal:
http://articles.latimes.com/20...

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


I think they should be able to get as political as they want
as long as they relinquish their special status vis a vis taxes. They can't have it both ways.

[ Parent ]
I agree...
we may disagree on what constitutes "political".  I don't think having Barack Obama, a member of the denomination, speak at a national meeting is inherently political.  If he is saying, "Vote for me for President" it is...if he is saying, "My faith in God has moved me in the following ways...." then it is'nt (which, incidentally, is what he did).  If the pastor in Pasadena asks, "Who would Jesus bomb?", I don't think that is political.  If he says, "Vote for John Kerry because he will end the war in Iraq" then that is political.

Conversely, if Pat Robertson runs for President, preaches that Bill Clinton should be impeached and says we should "take out" the President of Venezuela, then I think that is political.

"But when I see a 9-11 victim family on television, or whatever, I'm just like, 'Oh, shut up!' I'm so sick of them because they're always complaining."  Glenn Beck  


[ Parent ]
Tax-exempt groups and political speech
What is the argument for prohibiting candidate endorsements by groups that receive tax-exempt donations?  That it would be a subsidy by the taxpayers for political partisans?  I know it's rather ingrained in our culture now, but I believe it was only enacted in the 1950s.  My memory is that it was an anti-Catholic measure originally (fear of popes influencing elections and whatnot), but I might be wrong about that.

Many were increasingly of the opinion that they'd all made a big mistake in coming down from the trees in the first place.  And some said that even the trees had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have left the oceans. - Douglas Adams

[ Parent ]
The rules are pretty clear-cut
They can endorse anyone they want: they just don't get their precious little TAX EXEMPTION.

If they're allowed to endorse and keep their exemption, then I want to be able to deduct my own political donations from taxes.

Fair is fair.  

Defend the 1st, 10th, 14th and 17th Amendments - and Social Security! Vote Democratic!


where churches go, nonprofits should follow
If churches with tax exempt status get to play politics than nonprofits should to.

Funding tied to nonpolitical community organzation projects, coalition building projects, education projects all should be able to reach out to legislators and demand their voices heard.  

I would rather have nonprofits speaking for the downtrodden in this country than have rich churches exploit their congregation's beliefs by preaching from the pulpit.

If one is able to do it, so should the other.

One more point, the IRS should go after these churches immediately after the election.  Build a case, show the proof and take away their tax exempt status as soon as the partisanship blows away.


They won't do it
because getting rid of the tax-exempt status would be a massive tax increase. And taxes are inherently evil.

"I'll take incompetence over a business model incentivised to kill me any day." -- DtR(H)

Repeating the Great Depression?
"Yonder comes Father Coughlin, wearin' the silver chain, Cash on his stomach and Hitler on the brain." ---"Lindbergh", Woody Guthrie


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Advertise Here!
ads@coloradopols.com


Active Users
Currently 53 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Colorado Pols Network


Jeffco Pols
  More >

Denver Pols
  More >















RSS 2.0



Pols Gets Mobile: ColoradoPols.com/mobile/

Colorado Pols is on Twitter: twitter.com/coloradopols

Email Pols


How to Write a Diary That Will Make the Front Page



Terms of Use/Privacy Policy



Pols Posting Policies



The Pols "Mailbag"

Mailbag #1



Relevant Links

The Big Media Blog

Blog It Right

Blog For Growth

Blogometer

Colorado Capitol Journal

Colorado Center on Law and Policy

Colorado Democratic Party

Colorado Ethics Watch

Colorado Independent

Colorado Labor Blog

Colorado Veterans for America

Colorado Legislature

Colorado Lib

Colorado Libertarian Blog

Colorado Media Matters

Colorado Progressive Coalition

Colorado Republican Party

Colorado Secretary of State

Colorado Senate

Colorado Young Democrats

Commentary Today

Coyote Gulch

CU Democrats

Curious Stranger

Daily Kos

Dan Willis-Rumors

Dem Notes

Democracy for Colorado

Denver Politics

East Boulder County Politics

Ed Stein Ink

Election Neutrality Now

George in Denver

Great Education Colorado

Head First Colorado

The Hotline Political Network

Junction Daily Blog

Left in the West

Liberal and Loving It

Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado

Mount Virtus

MyDD

National Journal

On Call

Peak Dems

Political State Report

Progress Now

Prometheus

Project Vote Smart

Radio Free Denver

Senate Guru

Slapstick Politics

Steam Powered Opinions

Square State

Stygius

TalkLeft

The Thicket

The Bell Policy Center

The Hypothetical Wren

ThomasMC.com

Toilet Paper Online

TRACER Campaign Finance

View From a Height

Walter in Denver

Wash Park Prophet

Western Democrat



Colorado Pols is wholly owned by www.ColoradoPols.com, LLC
webmaster-at-coloradopols.com
Powered by: SoapBlox