9NEWS’ Brandon Rittiman:
Colorado taxpayers could be in for state tax refunds between $15 and $89 per person next year, depending on household income.
Those were the predictions from economists for the governor’s office and state legislature presented Wednesday to the state’s joint budget committee.
Colorado is collecting more and more tax revenue due to an improving economy…
In the minds of most Government 101-level citizens, an improving economy would ipso facto mean revenue to plow back into all the priorities the state needs to fund: health care, education, transportation, law enforcement. It would mean no more, or at least fewer quibbles about money to fund programs already on the books like driver licenses for undocumented residents, and properly funding the Colorado Bureau of Investigations for concealed-weapons background checks.
But in Colorado, with our 1992 Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights tying the hands of elected officials, that conventional wisdom is turned on its head. AP’s Ivan Moreno:
The state’s quarterly forecasts released Wednesday from legislative and governor’s office economists showed lawmakers they will have to refund anywhere from $70 million to $220 million in tax year 2016. Those refunds are triggered by the state’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, which calls for refunds when revenue exceeds the combined rate of inflation and population growth…
Democrats have long blasted TABOR spending limits as restricting government’s ability to make investments in services, particularly when the economy rebounds after years of cuts during recessions…Republicans, meanwhile, favor TABOR and see it as a needed check on overzealous government spending during economic booms.
If you ask the average Colorado citizen what TABOR does, if they have an answer at all it will usually be limited to its most famous provision requiring votes on tax increases. Unfortunately, that’s just the tip of a long, long iceberg. TABOR’s arbitrary limits on spending, restricted to the rates of inflation and population have made things even worse. The state has not fully restored the major cuts forced all over the budget during the recent recession–but without a statewide vote to allow “excess” funds to be retained and put to beneficial use, the benefit citizens naturally expect to realize from improving economy and government revenue is squandered.
Squandered so taxpayers can get a check for between $15 and $89. Yes, every dollar in your pocket counts. But the value of programs and services Coloradans rely on every day counts too, and in this case there is a strong argument that the personal benefit of properly funding our public institutions is worth more to a taxpayer than dinner at Chili’s.
Or at least it should be.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: ‘I’m Not COVID Vaxxed:’ Boebert Denies That Vaccination Caused Her Blood Clot
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: ‘I’m Not COVID Vaxxed:’ Boebert Denies That Vaccination Caused Her Blood Clot
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: ‘I’m Not COVID Vaxxed:’ Boebert Denies That Vaccination Caused Her Blood Clot
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: NOV GOP meltdown
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Try not spending it all in one place.
TABOR is the biggest swindle in Colorado history, except maybe the Nuggets.
Don’t like TABOR? Go to the voters.
Don’t like what the voters say? TOUGH LUCK, liberals.
Or there’s always federal court……. 🙂
Yup. But don’t even get Moderanus started.
Yeah but it usually only takes him a line or two to finish. Blah blah, liberals and it’s all over.
OK. You hate liberals. Got it. But, just for fun, has it ever occurred to you to consider the policy itself? Do you have any interest in thinking about whether tax payers would benefit more from contributing to infrastructure, education and other public services that make big differences in their every day lives than they would from being returned an amount of money that makes no significant difference in their lives? I’m not talking about coming to any particular conclusion. I’m just talking about giving it consideration and then presenting a case for whatever conclusion you reach? Of course not. Silly me. That would require a a bothersome thought process and thinking is something you have such a strong aversion to no one here has ever heard you express an independent thought.
The Denver Post says the lowest income taxpayers may also get an additional $230. That’s not too bad for a state refund.
redistribution of the wealth!
I’m pretty sure that’s the EITC bill Democrats passed–NOT TABOR.
That would explain it.