CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 10, 2014 09:29 AM UTC

Air...Water...Health...and Accommodation.

  • 7 Comments
  • by: Duke Cox

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

Photo courtesy Rep. Jared Polis
Photo courtesy Rep. Jared Polis

Today and tomorrow Governor Hickenloopers' Blue Ribbon Panel on Oil and Gas policy is meeting in Rifle to discuss the future of drilling and fracking in Colorado. Not many people I know have high hopes this will result in any groundbreaking policy suggestions, but it could. If the Commissioners are willing to set aside a century old principle for a few minutes and consider that we are living in 2014 and not 1872…and that consideration points the way to only one conclusion.

It is time to effectively incorporate the Rule of Reasonable Accommodation into COGCC policy, taking into consideration the advances in technology and practices used by the modern extraction industry.

When Congress split mineral and surface estates in the 19th century, it was done for reasons that seemed appropriate and necessary, at the time. But times have changed, and it is imperative that the "Blue Ribbon Panel" understand and act upon those changes. Since the beginning of the separation of the two estates, the mineral estate has generally considered to be dominant. The rationale for the mineral estate being dominant was that the ownership of minerals would be meaningless if the mineral owner could not access and extract those resources through the surface. That seems reasonable enough, and for a very long time, difficult to argue.

With advanced technology, specifically directional drilling, the Rule of Reasonable Accommodation becomes a much more flexible vehicle. The Rule, as set forth in CRS 34-60-127, states:

"An operator shall conduct operations in a manner that accommodates the surface owner by minimizing intrusion upon and damage to the surface of the land."

As used in this section, "minimizing intrusion upon" can include "selecting alternative locations for wells" among other measures as long as they are "technologically sound, economically practical, and reasonably available to the operator". With modern drilling practices providing the industry with the capability to reach out, literally and laterally, for miles, there is no longer any need for an operator to sit atop or even close to a mineral resource in order to gain access.

The Accommodation Doctrine was incorporated into O&G policy in Texas. The following is from the firm of Houston Harbaugh in Pittsburgh…

 

The Accommodation Doctrine, as first adopted by Texas in the 1971 case Getty Oil Company v. Jones, 470 S.W.2d 618 (Tex. 1971), tipped the balance between mineral and surface estates significantly back toward equilibrium.

Under the Accommodation Doctrine, the surface owner must generally show that the particular surface activities are not “reasonably necessary” to extract the oil or gas. Haupt Inc. v. Tarrant County Water, 870 S.W.2d 350 (Tex. App. Waco 1994). The surface owner can satisfy this threshold burden by showing that the mineral owner has available other reasonable means of production that will not interfere with the surface owner’s use. “[I]f reasonable alternative drilling methods exist that protect [the surface owner’s existing use], then an accommodation by the mineral owner would be required.” Tarrant County Water v. Haupt Inc., 854 S.W.2d 909, 912-913 (Tex. 1993).

 

It is pretty obvious that this "accommodation" policy has not squashed the oil and gas industry in Texas, nor will an application of fairness and consideration for Colorados' air and water quality, and the safety of its' citizens cripple the robust activity of this states O&G operators.

I have personally heard industry engineers boasting about their ability nowadays to reach out for thousands of yards with their high-tech drilling rigs. It is simply not necessary for an O&G mineral owner to park a drilling rig right on top of, or even close to the minerals they intend to access. I believe it is not unfair to expect operators to "accommodate" surface dwellers and owners by honoring a 2,500 ft. setback from occupied dwellings.

These twelve Coloradans, the Governors' hand picked panel, can make history by bringing Colorado Oil and Gas policy into the 21st Century. By recommending to the COGCC and the state legislature that a standard 2,500 ft. setback for O&G drilling should be enacted and enforced, the panel can defend Colorados' air, water, and people.

Comments

7 thoughts on “Air…Water…Health…and Accommodation.

  1. I won't believe it, until I sees it…Local Control…I don't see regular folk as being represented on this committee…Why is the burden of proof of harm always lands on the surface owner???
     

  2. It was also a different time when the amount of land owned was usually such a (rural) expanse that the surface damage ever incurred did not impinge on the habitability of the surface owner's total parcel. 

    Today, without accommodation, industry can make nearly totally uninhabitable the homes, air, and water of hundreds and thousands of residents.

  3. I hope that the panel listens to your well-reasoned argument, Duke. Adoption of the principle of reasonable accommodation would help keep many residents and school children from being gassed with methane and volatiles within Greeley city limits. 

  4. I think there are some good people on the panel that represent me pretty well.  But that is not the issue really to me, which is that the charge of the committee–on paper is too narrow and its 'real charge' to avoid direct citizen action is suspect.

    Until it is acknowledged that oil and gas development is a highly industrial, dangerous, toxic and polluting activity that the public has an absolute right to be protected from harm by, the safety of which must be incumbent on industry to demonstrate prior to permitting and not for citizens to show irrefutable harm, (i.e. proving that clustering of cancers, tumors, birth defects, around wherever unconventional field development occurs are not just 'anomalies' etc etc etc).there will be no peace in the oil patch.  

  5. Duke,  this is really interesting. I think you should run it by a lawyer friend or three and get some feedback. Maybe now is a good time for us to enter the 21st century and rethink accommodation? 

    Did you hit the task force with this idea? Do you have plans to confront the COGCC with it? 

    1. While  I was there, ardy, I talked with three of the commissioners about this idea. They were all interested and indicated that there are others thinking along this same line. We all know the frackers and the fracktivists are intransigent, and a compromise will be elusive. If achieved, said compromise will have to essentially be forced upon the two extreme camps.

      The beauty of a 2,500' setback is that it provides a de facto ban on drilling in many towns, because you would have to find a clear circle almost a mile in diameter in order to locate a drill pad. Where those locations are available, it should be fairly low impact to the surrounding area because of the distance.

      It also does not preclude any company from accessing their minerals. It will cost them a bit more, but mineral owners who have allowed surface development directly above the location of their minerals, without acting to prevent it, are guilty of failing to perform their due diligence. It falls into the category of "their tough luck"…they should have done something about it.

       

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

203 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!