CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 28, 2014 04:22 PM UTC

Gardner Camp Responds to Cosmopolitan Article by Ridiculing Magazine

  • 17 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Last Thursday we wrote about a story from Cosmopolitan magazine discussing the Personhood issue in Congress, with a focus on Colorado Rep. Cory Gardner's struggles with flip-flopping on the issue. Here's the money quote from that story:

[Gardner has] built his entire political career on support of personhood," Personhood USA president Keith Mason told Cosmopolitan.com. "I think he's just listening to some bad advice, and he's playing politics."

A few hours after our post first appeared on Colorado Pols, Gardner's campaign responded via Twitter in just about the worst possible manner — by (SURPRISE!) making fun of women's magazines. From Jill Filipovic of Cosmopolitan:

This week, journalist Ada Calhoun published a piece on Cosmopolitan.com about personhood bills, wildly unpopular right-wing legislation that would outlaw abortion and, potentially, some forms of birth control and in-vitro fertilization. She highlighted the Senate race in Colorado between pro-choice candidate Mark Udall and his anti-abortion opponent, Cory Gardner, who supported state personhood legislation until he didn't, and who remains a co-sponsor of federal personhood legislation. Udall's press team tweeted the article. In response, Sam Stookesberry, Gardner's deputy press secretary until last month, responded:

Cosmo Tweets
You may want to adjust those blinders

That kind of condescension is de rigueur when you write in lady-mag land. If your outlet brands itself as a "women's publication," the automatic assumption is that it's lowbrow, apolitical, superficial, or all of the above. And there's certainly plenty of content in traditional women's magazines and websites that fits the bill.

But mainstream "serious" media, with its regular forays into rape apologia and marginalizing female accomplishment, isn't exactly an enjoyable place for the feminist-hearted either. And while beauty tips, fashion spreads, and sex advice are staples of women's publications, so is an abundance of serious reporting and thoughtful writing from excellent journalists. Calhoun, for example, has written for The New York Times, New York Magazine, NewYorker.com, and the New Republic — and that's just the "N" section of her resume. Put her in Cosmo, though, and suddenly "hard-hitting journalist" becomes a sarcastic reproach instead of an accurate characterization…

…The reaction to an article's placement also serves as a handy litmus test: Whether a person engages with the work sincerely or whether their go-to response is to brush it off because it appears in a women's publication alongside celebrity, fashion, and sex coverage offers a pretty clear read on how they view women more generally. [Pols emphasis] Which makes smarmy dismissals from conservative men fairly predictable — if especially rich when those men's patronizing tweets are published alongside their own less-than-hard-hitting style advice.

As we wrote last week, it would be foolish to dismiss something that appears in Cosmopolitan magazine — which boasts a readership of a female demographic that Gardner desperately needs in order to have any hope of defeating Sen. Mark Udall in November. It is completely irrelevant if some individuals — primarily men — brush Cosmo off as unimportant. Cosmopolitan magazine isn't trying to influence an audience of conservative men…even if that's all Cory Gardner's campaign can think about.

Tweet
Share

Comments

17 thoughts on “Gardner Camp Responds to Cosmopolitan Article by Ridiculing Magazine”

  1. "Gardner has built his entire political career on support of Personhood"

    With all due respect, Keith, that's a ridiculous thing to say. I'm afraid you've lost sight of the goal. Gardner is pro-life. Let him get past this election and he'll do right by us.

    1. Conservatard, Gardner cannot run from his support of personhood. The Colorado voters will not forget. personhood is going to sink the far right nut Cory Gardner

    1. Ken Buck's "high heels" remark, shockingly, did nothing for him with the lady voters. 

      Neither did his callous dismissal of Maria Gaspard's domestic violence complaint.

      Buck said, "Just because you become a victim of a crime doesn’t mean you win the citizenship or green-card lottery.” This and similar cases gave him a reputation among immigrants in Weld County that "it’s not safe to come forward and report crimes, and the result is everybody in Weld County is not safe.”

       

      And his big idea to privatize VA hospitals did not win him many votes from veterans….Vets like their VA care…they just would like to access it more easily.

    2. We long for the pre-Kansas Compact lawsuit days when we had water in Bonny Reservoir – bikini-clad bodies strolling the beaches and yes, all of that epic summer sex that came with our eastern-Colorado-playground-turned-mud hole.

      Now all we're left with is 'Lake Yuma'…

       

  4. So Cosmo your fat, 
    Well I ain't down with that….

    (Sir Mix A Lot)

    I mean, seriously, Cosmo has a huge readership.  But at the end of the day, it isn't exactly a serious publication.  Making fun of it is completely fair game. 

  5. So Cosmo says your fat, 
    Well I ain't down with that….

    (Sir Mix A Lot)

    I mean, seriously, Cosmo has a huge readership.  But at the end of the day, it isn't exactly a serious publication.  Making fun of it is completely fair game. 

  6. Fair game?  So? The quesion is wether its good tactics when your guy is already down by double digits in a key demographic–Colorado women voters.  

  7. So, no one is questioning the accuracy of the article, right? They're just scoffing at the magazine itself, because it's a Women's Magazine…..?  How very GOP of them.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

78 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!