CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 25, 2014 01:49 PM UTC

Low-Budget Denver Loses 2016 RNC Bid

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
It was not meant to be.
It was not meant to be.

​That's the word from Brandon Rittiman at 9NEWS today:

Denver is out of the running to host the 2016 Republican National Convention. Cleveland and Dallas are the two finalist cities.

"While we're thrilled to have made it this far, we are disappointed with today's decision," said Pete Coors, chairman of Denver's bid. "Denver has the amenities, the community, the political climate and a proven track record that would have made it the perfect place to host the 2016 Republican National Convention."

It's a bipartisan shame, as the Republican National Convention could have been expected to deliver a similar boost to the local economy as the Democratic National Convention did in 2008. Ironically, the lack of taxpayer dollars to help pay for the convention in TABOR-shackled Colorado might have hurt our bid for the RNC:

Sources close to the negotiations told 9NEWS Denver struggled to match the fundraising effort of Dallas, which has public funds available for attracting conventions. [Pols emphasis]

Organizers of the Denver bid pledged early on to mount their effort with only private money.

You'd think that an all-privately funded convention would be exactly what small-government conservative Republicans want, wouldn't you? We can't help but imagine local organizers thought so.

Apparently, that was naïve of them.

Comments

18 thoughts on “Low-Budget Denver Loses 2016 RNC Bid

    1. What would the cost have been? It would have been a boon for the local economy. Partisanship is getting in the way of common sense here, as Pols notes.

  1. The real Republican way always involves OPM . . . 

    . . . damn.  I was so looking forward to the money I would have made from renting my bungalow to Mitt and Ann !

      1. Swing? Not anymore. Not after what Kasich and Portman has done to Ohio.

        They'll be out in a short order, and the 20 EV's will go to the Democratic Party. Permanently.

         

         

      1. I really doubt that had anything to do with it.  I think they would have really enjoyed getting stoned legally.  The old purity laws to close the Sid King down, leaving no strippers and booze together probably had more effect. 

        1. It may have had an effect ..in reverse.

          When I was much younger, my previous wife and I did a couple of seasons cleaning for a living in Breckenridge. Almost without exception, the messiest, most drunken, and out of control groups were the church groups from, what are now, bright red states. When the fetters of repression are removed, the most repressed tend to respond most aggressively…I think that is fair to say. It certainly was our observation.

          Maybe the Republican Party leadership just know their base too well…laugh

  2. Nice news to come home from a long day at the court…

    I didn't want the stench to come in and make me hide for two weeks.

    It'll end up being in Dallas, where no-one cares except Moddy, Fladen, and maybe Head Banger..

    1. If the Republcian National Convention is in Dallas, the Republican Party will basically talking to themselves instead of attempting to increase their political market-share (so to speak).

       

       

  3. Also, there *WILL* be a time when no major cities will want the RNC anywhere, except Bumfuck, Idaho, or Northern Marinana Islands.

     

     

    1. It depends on how you define "major city." If you define "major city"  as a city with a population of 1/2 million in the city proper, I can't think of too many that the GOP has a snowballs chance in hell of winning. Major cities don't via for an RNC convention  because they agree with them–most major cities are solidly Democratic–they vie for it because of the economic and publicity benefits.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

164 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!