CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 10, 2014 12:15 PM UTC

Cory Gardner Polls Similar to Randy Baumgardner in Senate Race

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
GardnerStache
Maybe Cory Gardner would poll better if he had Randy Baumgardner’s moustache.

New polling data on Colorado's U.S. Senate race was made available today by the right-leaning firm Rasmussen Reports, and the results are telling in their sameness compared to previous polls. Rasmussen now keeps Toplines and Crosstabs behind a paywall, so we don't know the answer to the question that we've always found more telling than anything ("very favorable" vs. "very unfavorable" ratings). But in a head-to-head matchup, here's how Rasmussen sees it right now:

Mark Udall: 42%
Cory Gardner: 41%
Other: 5%
Undecided: 13%

Astute readers might recall that these numbers are not all that different from the last public poll in this race: The Quinnipiac University poll in early February. Here's how Quinnipiac shook out the numbers one month ago on the question of theoretical head-to-head matchups:

Mark Udall: 45%
Ken Buck: 42%

Mark Udall: 43%
Randy Baumgardner: 41%

Mark Udall: 44%
Owen Hill: 39%

Mark Udall: 43%
Amy Stephens: 41%

As we've discussed in this space before, we have a hard time seeing how Gardner is going to be able to move to the middle and raise his low name ID in time to defeat Udall in November (assuming, of course, that Owen Hill does not win the GOP Primary). Gardner may be a better U.S. Senate candidate for Republicans because of his fundraising ability, but he's not an election-changing candidate in and of himself.

Baumgardner's 41% in the Quinnipiac poll last month was essentially an example of how a "generic Republican" might fare in a head-to-head matchup with Udall. One month later, the GOP's beacon of hope (Gardner, in case you were getting confused) is polling no better than a guy known only for his outlandish moustache. If the polls are correct, Gardner is no different than any other "generic Republican" choice at this point in the election cycle. If that's still a "game changer," maybe we're talking about different games.

 

Tweet
Share

Comments

14 thoughts on “Cory Gardner Polls Similar to Randy Baumgardner in Senate Race”

  1. Rasmussen is not right leaning.  Scott Rasmussen sold his interest and, if anything, they lean left.  They have generally had the most pro-Obama numbers in the approval polling this year.

    42-41 for an incumbernt is not good for the incumbent.

    It is good for the country.

    1. Last cycle, Rasmussen leaned hard right on individual polls until close to the election. To me they're just one poll, and not a particularly trustworthy one…

      Together with the Q-poll, though, a trend is beginning to form in poll numbers: Udall needs to get going to solidify his support or he's going to be in trouble. 42% for an incumbent isn't where he wants to be.

      1. Poll averaging sites are  much better indicators. Real Clear Politics and TPM are two that come to mind that report several polls on any given day on any given question, race, approval rating, etc. and also provide an average of the combined results of a variety of polls, left and right leaning, smaller and larger.  All the big name polls.

        Taking heart from a Dem challenger polling close to and occasionally a point or two better than an R incumbent only to be disappointed when the R incumbent wins easily has taught me that a challenger has to be doing consistently and significantly better than an incumbent over time and going into the home stretch, not just close and/or a bit better here and there, in order to go on to defeat that incumbent. Close doesn't get it done against incumbency. All Pols this far out should be taken with a grain of sat unless there are consistent big leads. 

        1. However, it is also a rule in polling that incumbents should poll close to or above 50% in order to be safe. Polling down in the low 40s is not traditionally a safe spot for an incumbent.

          I do think that this year there will be a narrative developing around negative Congressional approval ratings, where incumbents will poll lower yet wind up still winning. It's a known tendency to think our own Congressman/Senator is fine – that it's just the rest of the Congress that sucks. I think in the end that's what will happen here.

          1. These are all Colorado voters who don't seem to think their Senator is doing fine.  If the undecides break 2-1 to 3-1 against the incumbent, which is the normal range, this could get ugly.

              1.  

                Michael, I appreciate your offer, but being outed, even in pleasant circumstances, is something I would not want.

                Were you thinking my numbers as to how undecided usually break is off, or that Udall is going to start to pick up steam?

                 

                1. I have no angst about this race, Andrew.  And don't worry, I'm not attempting to out you.  The offer stands shoudl you change your mind.  We can have breakfast in Haigler, NE and my lips will be sealed.

    2. You only say it leans left because it doesn't "skew" enough to the right for your tastes. 

      Face it, Rasmussen is the most conservative-leaning of the mainstream pollsters. They also happen to be the most inaccurate of the mainstream pollsters. 

  2. I don't really have anything to say about this race. But I just have to say that cutout of Randy Baumgar's mustache on Cory Gardner's face is super creepy. It looks like a scalpel removed it and just laid it on Gardner's face. All that's missing is the blood. Gross. Find another image.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

210 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!