CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 16, 2014 01:15 PM UTC

Tancredo says Republicans "will not beat Hickenlooper" on gun issues

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Promoted by Colorado Pols)

On KNUS radio this morning, host Dan Caplis said it was "legitimate" for Sen. Greg Brophy to spotlight Tom Tancredo's post-Columbine vote for a House resolution limiting, among other things, the size of magazines to 10 rounds or fewer, the same limitation put on magazines by one of Colorado's new gun-safety laws.

In response, Tancredo, who's battling Brophy for the chance to take on Gov. John Hickenlooper in November, downplayed the importance of the gun-safety issues in the upcoming general election, saying, "We are not going to win an election on this."

Here's part of Tanc's response, as heard on KNUS:

Tancredo: "I'll tell you that if, indeed, anybody believes that the Republican nominee, whoever that might be, can win the general election on this [gun] issue, or a couple of others that are fairly focused, they're wrong. We will not beat Hickenlooper, I don't care who it is, we will not beat Hickenlooper on this issue… We are not going to win an election on this. …

The NRA has always supported me. These things are essentially frivolous attacks that do not help in the long run. And as I say, I do not agree with you that this is something that the other side will use. Do you really believe that Hickenlooper would be attacking me for being soft on guns?"

Caplis: I think it would come up. And I think you'd handle it well…. Here's how I would definitely see it coming up in the campaign. You're running against Hickenlooper. You're the nominee. You're bashing him…he tried to restrict Coloradans' gun rights. And then Hickenlooper turns around with their 527s… 'Wait a second. Tom agrees with Hickelooper on this.'

Listen to Tancredo on Caplis saying GOP won't beat Hick on Guns

Comments

12 thoughts on “Tancredo says Republicans “will not beat Hickenlooper” on gun issues

      1. Moddy will be singing from "The Praises of 'Tanc," just a soon as the primaries and caucuses are over (and he's getting paid for it, . . . of course!)

        Same goes for "Buck's Alltime Greatest Chart Toppers" . . . 

         

        On a totally unrelated note,

        . . . anyone ever hear whatever happened to that douchenozzle, ArapaGOP???   Just curious . . . 

        1. I've sort of wondered the same thing myself along with the n3bbisher and its offensive av image.You'd believe any gun related thread would bring them out of the woodwork to proclaim the glories of their genitalia enhancers and the benefits of a totally armed society. We could only be so fortunate as to have any association with the Republican party of the time be so embarrassing that even the most wingy of the nuts don't want to claim their connection.

           

           

  1. Nobody is going to beat Hick on gun issues alone. Gunzos are like 25% of the population, and they overlap with hardcore anti-abortion people, and they are in all political affiliations. The old PPP post-recall poll showed that. 

    Latinos and anti-racists are never going to forgive or forget Tancredo's vicious anti-immigration rants, so they (we) will never vote for him. 

    But his anti-immigrant stance is what makes him appealing to a certain young white low-information voter. Not necessarily racist, but working in construction, convinced that immigrant labor takes the bottom out from wages in this industry. It's hard to argue, because it's true. People scared of being deported will put up with poor wages and working conditions, and work hard, too.

    Yes, a path to citizenship will help people come out from the shadows and wages will come up. That will take awhile. And these low-info voters propelled the Tanc to 37% of the vote in 2010. 

    So Tancredo is bolstering his following among these mostly young voters with his ganja-friendly stance.  I don't think Tancredo will be the R nominee, because i think that Gessler will manipulate the system to gain the nomination. But Tancredo is the greater threat. 

    1. Of course nobody is going to beat the Governor  on gun issues because the people for whom gun-rights are a hot-button issue wouldn't have voted for Hickenlooper under any circumstance, and the people who do support Hickenlooper aren't swayed on guns alone. 

       

    2. Don't see Tanc's pot friendly stance as a way of winning him more support among young R primary voters than he already has. None at all in a general. After all, it's already legal under Hick who isn't going to be running on repealing it. Not a campaign issue unless it's different from the other guy's. It doesn't exploit a difference. Now if he could be pro-puppy and get Hick to come out for gut shooting puppies, that could make a real difference.

      1. You're right BC, in that there won't be any substantial marijuana legislation to argue about at this point. All of the R candidates support the voters  in legalizing marijuana. 

        Tancredo is the only one who's gone so far as to say he will smoke it in public, that he sees Colorado's law as repealing prohibition, etc. That kind of talk endears him to the pot-smoking crowd. 

        In my opinion, none of these guys (Brophy, Tancredo, Gessler) can crack 35% in a general election, because they all have limited appeal or significant liabilities. Now, if only we had some really good progressive, independent candidate coming in to challenge both sides….cool

          1. True. But in any case you have to have somebody who wants to repeal legal pot in order for being in favor to make any difference. If everyone running is OK with it, it's  nothing. So if he's pandering, he's forgotten how to do it.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

169 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!