President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) J. Sonnenberg

(R) Ted Harvey

20%↑

15%↑

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

(R) Doug Bruce

20%

20%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

40%↑

20%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 10, 2013 07:50 AM UTC

#Obamaquester? Too Clever By Half

  • 6 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

jedimindtrickOur friends at the Washington Post report:

Congressional Republicans now have a hashtag for their efforts to pin the blame for the looming sequester on President Obama: #Obamaquester.

President Obama this week ramped up public calls for the GOP’s cooperation on averting the deep automatic spending cuts set to go into effect on March 1. 

The National Republican Campaign Committee and House leadership on Friday began pushing the hashtag #Obamaquester, surfacing an excerpt from Bob Woodward’s book “The Price of Politics,” wherein Obama aide Jack Lew first proposes the deep cuts as a trigger for future action on debt…

But as Natalie Jennings at the Post quickly reminds her readers, the plan for "sequester" cuts in the Budget Control Act of 2011 were approved by a large majority of Republicans–a much greater percentage of Republicans than Democrats in fact–at the end of a long episode where those very same Republicans held the nation hostage in demand of…bigger budget cuts! You remember all of this, don't you? It wasn't that long ago. 

Aaron Blake with some insight as to why this strange little feint is happening:

So in total, more than 70 percent of congressional Republicans voted for the deal that included the sequester, while 58 percent of Democrats voted for it.

In part because of that bipartisan vote, a Romney ad that labeled the sequester as “Obama’s defense cuts” was rated only “half true” by Politifact.

Republicans are engaging in smart political strategy. They know that if the sequester cuts go into effect, there will be a huge amount of blame ready to be heaped on whoever is seen as culpable. And by repeatedly referring to the cuts as Obama’s idea (something that is technically correct), they are trying to win the war of semantics, which the White House has been more successful at in recent months.

First of all, you have to concede that this really is a bold, albiet risky political strategy for the GOP. The kinds of large cuts prescribed by the "sequester" are indeed universally unpopular, and Republicans can point to the fact that the plan for automatic sequester cuts technically does appear to have originated in the White House. In today's media bubble of false equivalency and shallow analysis, Republicans might honestly think they can pivot to becoming the saviors of many of the same popular programs that they have spent so many years threatening. You'll recall that Republicans in Colorado tried this too with regard to education funding in 2011.

The problem, of course, is that it's an absolute load of crap.

Polling has demonstrated consistently that voters absolutely know who to blame for the last few years of manufactured budget crises in Washington. The long fiscal battles between the post-2010 Republican Congress and President Barack Obama left a lasting impression on the electorate, and directly contributed to Republican losses in last November's elections. The voters know who has been threatening to cut programs they value all this time. They know the "sequester," whoever it was that may have come up with the idea, was an appeasement of an ideoligically fixated GOP–hell-bent on slashing government at all levels.

With the "Obamaquester," the GOP's desire to run away from their own record veers into the farcical.

Comments

6 thoughts on “#Obamaquester? Too Clever By Half

  1. Obamaquester? They must be getting pretty desperate.  Doesn't exactly roll of the tongue like "Obamacare", does it?

    PS: Trying to post again.  Got that slow down message which can't possibly be referring to my typing speed. What the heck is that? A new one on me in the message dept.

    1. After you reported this, we were able to isolate the problem! It was apparently related to the disabling of IP address logging for comments, and the system has been sending that message frequently when two comments from any account were posted too close in time together. This resulted in a significant number of users getting that error. We're pretty sure we've fixed this problem now, please let us know if it happens again.

    2. They must be getting pretty desperate.

      Yep…that's how it appears. I saw Luntz on Faux news some days ago, going through the new litany of "Republicanese" with a rather ditzy sort of lady host. I don't  tune in there enough to remember many of the names.

      She was doing the "aww, shucks…gee wheez… you are so smart, Mr. Luntz " bit as he brazenly laid out the new official misdirection list. I don't remember them, exactly, but I remember being impressed with the audacity and thinking they must be desperate to get these talking points out quickly so as to try to stop the bleeding. Next thing you know, the party will try to ban three cornered hats…then, watch out.

      1. Ah, the old "Do as I say, not as I do" ploy.  Kind of  tough turnabout.  Their base wants the cliff-diving sequester "Baby with the bathwater" cuts.  And every one else knows that it was the Republicans that want to gut anything that doesn't directly benefit their billionaire benefactors and defense contractors.

        But now that the GOP is the born-again Keynesian Party, they want to shirk any responsibility for the inevitable economic pain they cause from demanding drastic government spending cuts.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

187 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!