To post this comment click here:
Otherwise click cancel.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=piHDLNzccSU&search=rubenstein
The video of Both Ways Bob's draft info is also on the youtube.com Web site. Interesting details are brought out in the video.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=1ep33wuntKo&search=both%20ways%20bob
...who is in bed with big oil?
...who has a proven record of voting against gay rights?
Vote Perlmutter. For Truth.
I would hope that people don't just think because the pictures move it is a TV ad.
I've seen and heard both Peggy and Ed speak out about Iraq. They're both clearly against the war. The concept that nobody speaks against the war except for Herb is ridiculous and wholly fabricated. Go to an event, debate, a campaign office, anyplace to find the candidates, and speak to them about it and learn for yourselves if you are buying into this incredible line of spin. I'm really tired of seeing this campaign angling from Herb's people.
Herb claims to stand for integrity and ethics - well suggesting that the other candidates don't speak about the war is a blatant lie used to attract attention. Not exactly ethical now is it?
I agree that Peggy's position on the website is wish-washy, but I have heard her say that she was against the decision to go to war and supports ending our involvement. I think it's afe to say she won't be voting with the GOP regarding our policies in Iraq.
Ed's position is full support of the Murtha Plan. I personally agree with this, as I believe that there could be serious losses of human life if we entirely pulled out of the country. An Iragi life is worth the same as an American life in my mind, and if we simply desert the region there is a strong possiblity of violent civil war and chaos. Colin Powell said "You break it, you buy it" when referring to out invasion of Iraq. Whether or not you agree with the government's decision to do so, we now have an obligation in that country. Redeployment within the region is what I feel is the most responsible option.
My issue with Herb is that he's selling a dream that is very far removed from political realities. A candidate could attract Democratic voters by trumpeting his pledge to create universal healthcare by 2008, but most astute observers know that a freshman Congressman could never hope to actually deliver this promise. Herb's pledges and fiery rhetoric ring false to me, because I believe that he has no capability to deliver. Ed at least has the guts to propose support of a viable option. He could just as easily promise everbody that he'll stonewall for immediate troop withdrawl, but he's not the type of person to raise false hopes for electoral purposes.
We send our kids to school in an effort to give them a competitive edge in life, yet we don't demand competition of the institutions we send them to.
Could we? Could we just hear you ring in about any or all of those three issues and why you feel Herb is still the best candidate based on those ideas he has talked about and written about at length?
Starting to wonder if Herb stands for anything other than being against something.
Trust me...if your hope is to further his campaign with your nonstop rhetoric regarding the war, your method of convincing voters is not working.
I'm serious. I'd like a fleshed out reply to each of those three issues.
Thanks, the war matters or Iraq Matters. Whichever one of you wants to reply or even both (hey, the more the merrier), I'd be grateful.
Herb, your press secretary is also invited to respond since he blogs on this subject both here and at SquareState quite often. "I wouldn't characterize caloric intake as "professional development." c rork
When this campaign began Lamm and Perlmutter ignored the war. Herb Rubenstein alone made the war an issue and forced the others to come out against the War in Iraq. At the beginning Perlmutter and Lamm simply toed the Bush administration line. Today Lamm’s position is still shameful. Read her own words at PeggyLammforCongress.com and it is pure and utter gibberish. Perlmutter started out ducking the war and also toeing the Bush line. But after his pollster said it was OK now Perlmutter at least is sort of against the War. If it were Lamm vs. Perlmutter neither would have said one word about Iraq. Thank goodness Herb Rubenstein forced Democrats to actually talk about issues.
Don't expect to hear a lot about the breathalyzers, consumption tax, classrooms cameras, or any of the other whacky theories. He's backed off from that stuff big time since learning how negatively people react.
Your commercial was weak and it does not make a candidate for Congress.
Relevant Links
The Big Media Blog
Blog It Right
Blog For Growth
Blogometer
Business Word
Colorado Capitol Journal
Colorado Center on Law and Policy
Colorado Democratic Party
Colorado Ethics Watch
Colorado Independent
Colorado Labor Blog
Colorado Veterans for America
Colorado Legislature
Colorado Lib
Colorado Libertarian Blog
Colorado Media Matters
Colorado Progressive Coalition
Colorado Republican Party
Colorado Secretary of State
Colorado Senate Dems
Colorado Senate GOP
Colorado Young Democrats
Commentary Today
Coyote Gulch
CU Democrats
Curious Stranger
Daily Kos
Dan Willis-Rumors
Dem Notes
Democracy for Colorado
Denver Politics
East Boulder County Politics
Ed Stein Ink
Election Neutrality Now
eleXn
George in Denver
Great Education Colorado
Head First Colorado
The Hotline Political Network
Junction Daily Blog
Left in the West
Liberal and Loving It
Maintain Educational Standards in Colorado
Mount Virtus
MyDD
National Journal
On Call
Peak Dems
Political State Report
Progress Now
Prometheus
Project Vote Smart
Radio Free Denver
Senate Guru
Slapstick Politics
Steam Powered Opinions
Square State
Stygius
TalkLeft
The Thicket
The Bell Policy Center
The Hypothetical Wren
ThomasMC.com
Toilet Paper Online
TRACER Campaign Finance
View From a Height
Walter in Denver
Wash Park Prophet
Western Democrat