CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 16, 2009 04:33 AM UTC

Jaeger's $230 Million Folly: Rueter Hess Reservoir

  • 3 Comments
  • by: JeffcoBlue

If you have driven up I-25 from Castle Rock any time lately, you might have noticed a new construction project going on in a valley to the southwest of the Lincoln exit. It appears to be a massive dam, large enough that you would expect the lake it contained to be as massive as Cherry Creek Reservoir or Standley Lake. It would be, or, conceivably, could be, if it were full. In fact, when full, the lake created by the new dam, titled in anticipation the Rueter Hess Reservoir, would fill in the entire valley, with shores lapping at the embankments of I-25 itself. That’s a mighty big lake, you might think. How do they plan to fill it up?

That is the question everyone is asking, especially residents of Parker, who will ultimately have to pay for the $230 million dollar dam. Digging a big hole in the ground is relatively easy-securing water rights to fill it is another story. Colorado’s water rights are granted on the basis of prior appropriation, that is, first come, first served. Furthermore, since water was a necessary resource for the settlement of the west, most of the water along the Front Range was appropriated-claimed-in the 1860’s.

Now, if you are picturing a bunch of old dead pioneers clutching their water deeds in the grave, you might not be too far from the truth. Parker will have to, essentially, pry water rights out of cold, dead hands in order to fill Rueter Hess. The old water rights aren’t going to waste-Colorado law also requires that water be put to beneficial use (or at least said to be)-and have been bought by thirsty, growing suburban communities. Parker isn’t much different from Westminster or any other suburb, they were just a little late to the game.

Originally, the planners of Rueter Hess did not expect to need water rights. Overflow of Cherry Creek and natural runoff from the arroyos and ephemeral streambeds surrounding the area were supposed to fill the reservoir. In theory, that was a nice idea-a dam to catch the water that naturally wants to be there. In practice, it was a pipe dream. Cherry Creek is not known for overflowing. In fact, the constructors of the original Rocky Mountain News building built the offices right in the middle of the stream, because the dry, level sand made a nice smooth foundation. (Of course, when heavy rains came, Cherry Creek flowed, washing the building away. Needless to say, they rebuilt in a safer spot.) As the plans for Rueter Hess enlarged, the idea of the lake filling naturally became more and more unfeasible.

This has the reservoir planners scrambling for new sources of water, none of which are nearby or cheap. According to the Denver Post:

Most water to fill the Rueter-Hess reservoir “will have to be imported,” said Frank Jaeger, manager of the Parker Water and Sanitation District, who for 25 years has led the effort to supply 450,000 suburban residents.

Importing water would require multibillion-dollar pumping and piping from rivers running down the western side of the Continental Divide, such as the Colorado, back across mountains to Front Range residents, Jaeger said.

Though huge, the costs likely would be less than for alternatives such as trapping and treating contaminated water from the South Platte or Arkansas rivers, he said.

The option Jaeger and a Colorado-Wyoming coalition of municipal suppliers favor – one of four being considered by state natural resources officials – would divert water from the Flaming Gorge Reservoir in western Wyoming along Interstate 80 to Colorado.

Any of these options seems ridiculously expensive, especially when added to the large price tag already hanging on the dam’s construction. Who will pay for another transcontinental tunnel or an interstate aqueduct? Apparently, Parker hopes that future residents will-if those residents don’t decide to move to the Western Slope instead, where the water already is. As it stands, current Parker residents are balking already at a 28% tax hike proposed to pay simply for operating costs.

Frank Jaeger is taking the old Field of Dreams attitude about the project, figuring if he builds it, they will come:

Critics “can make their claims,” but the reservoir will be crucial to sustain population growth, Jaeger said. Paying off the debt for the construction now underway all depends on tax revenues from future growth, he said.

“To say, ‘We’ll just shut off growth’ will only exacerbate problems,” he said. “If you don’t pay off debt, what do you do? What does that do to the economy of the whole state? We need steady, controlled growth. All our needs for a reasonable lifestyle are tied into this.”

What Jaeger fails to realize is that growth follows demand-and his ponzi scheme isn’t creating a whole lot of that. Of course, he may be in too deep to pull out now. The dam is practically complete, and Parker will pay for it, one way or another. Whether or not the reservoir will be filled remains to be seen. One thing we do know is that the dam itself will be named after Frank Jaeger. So, just in case it someday becomes the world’s tallest skateboarding ramp, rather than a practical reservoir, the thirsty kids from indigent Parker families can brag, “dude, they built this when they were doin’ shots of Jaeger!”  

Comments

3 thoughts on “Jaeger’s $230 Million Folly: Rueter Hess Reservoir

  1. It is unfortunate that Mr. Finely could not take the time to tell the full story of Rueter-Hess.  There was no mention of how the Reservoir in its initial stage will help extend the life of the aquifers that serve Northern Douglas County area.  No mention of the partners that are a part of the project and how they plan to benefit from the forward thinking of the District.  No mention of the EIS or SEIS that show what water is available to the District for filling Rueter-Hess.  No mention of previous Denver Post articles touting how great the project is.  No mention of the support that State leaders gave to the project when it was in its permitting stage.  Why the volume of erroneous discussion about how the project will be paid for?

    Mr. Kuhn:  A “Ponzi scheme.”  Given that every water project in this state has been built via loans and financing, I suppose you had some other method in mind for financing this project.  Or, is it that Parker, as well as every other Front Range provider, presents a threat to the little game you have of denying that there is surplus water of at least 500,000 acre-feet going out of state every year to water California lawns?  “Twenty times more expensive and ten times the size?”  Again, read the EIS, and by the way, you have never built a project of this quality for so little per acre-foot.  Mr. Kuhn you got one thing right, you “bristle at talk of diverting more water across the mountains to fill it.”  You also are willing to lie to stop it.

    JfffcoBlue:

    1. The total price tag for Rueter-Hess is about $160M

    2. PWSD has already received over $60M from partners, thus the cost to PWSD residents is about $100M, not $230M (only off by a factor of 2!)

    3. PWSD has sufficient water rights to fill original reservoir

    4. All South Metro water providers have been saying for years that additional renewable water was needed – anyone surprised by that has not been listening

    5. Anonymous letters that don’t get any facts correct and engage in personal attacks don’t deserve any attention and are damaging to the public interest.

    1. The price tag question will get answered differently depending on how it’s asked. But the $230mm number doesn’t appear incorrect.

      Are those EIS/SEIS public knowledge? Are there dissenting opinions?  I’m not a water expertbut I have a pretty good understanding of how it works-and off the top of my head it seems surprising there is enough water to fill the current design.

      PWSD had sufficient water to fill the original hole- but the hole got bigger. The plan has expanded – and not for bad reasons, as far as I can tell. There is a need for water storage if this part of Douglas County is going to continue to develop and draw people.

      The surprising part is how the current residents of Parker are going to be paying now, for this asset that will benefit their new, as yet unbuilt, neighbors.

      You are in a public campaign for voter support, and you claim the facts being reported are incorrect. Document your facts- clearly the DP article and some of the commenters quote sources that make your facts appear incorrect.  Even the Parker Water website does not confirm all your statements. And the opposition, while clearly disorganized and prone to overreach, has some reasonable points. Besides which, since when is the rule that only facts can be used to decide an election or influence how people vote?  The voters in Douglas County have been saying no to all kinds of things perceived to be an increased expense, or even no decrease. They say yes when you can show lower cost (or anti union progress).  

      The recall appears to have the current DougCo voters’ sentiment on their side.

  2. Something doesn’t sound right- though H20 issues around here frequently sound…unblieveable.

    Who will pay for another transcontinental tunnel or an interstate aqueduct? Apparently, Parker hopes that future residents will-if those residents don’t decide to move to the Western Slope instead, where the water already is. As it stands, current Parker residents are balking already at a 28% tax hike proposed to pay simply for operating costs.

    If the current Parker residents actually recall their water board- will the 28% increase be stopped? Or is it too late for that?

    Didn’t these voters just last year kill 3A3B that would have stabilized the school district? I realize water is water and schools are optional, but  really? These guys are going to pay for water for the future residents?

    And why would the future residents move further west? Why not just to Aurora/Centennial where CCSD is funded and water is already secured?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

163 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!