The Big Budget Deal, Guns, and Gardner

Trump sign bill, but Trump still mad!

After briefly threatening a veto — and randomly asking Congress to give him line item veto powers (and eliminating the filibuster) — President Trump today signed a massive $1.3 trillion spending deal that includes changes to background checks for gun purchases that Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Yuma) opposed to the very end. If that sentence seems complicated…well, it is. There’s no easy way to unpack the giant omnibus spending bill rammed through by Congress early this morning.

Let’s start things off with the Washington Post reporting from the White House:

Just hours after threatening a veto, President Trump said Friday afternoon that he had signed a “ridiculous” $1.3 trillion spending bill passed by Congress early Friday and averted a government shutdown…

…But speaking to reporters at the White House about four hours later, Trump said he had decided to sign the bill despite his reservations, arguing that it provides much-needed funding for the military, including a pay increase for troops and new equipment.

In his remarks to the media today, Trump was in full angry old man mode. From the New York Times:

In a rambling and disjointed 20-minute statement from the Diplomatic Reception Room, Mr. Trump denigrated the bill, which was rushed through the House and the Senate by members of his own Republican Party, as “crazy” and vowed to never “sign another bill like this again.”

“Nobody read it,” Mr. Trump said of the sweeping funding measure drawn up by Republican leaders in the House and the Senate. Echoing criticism from those who voted against the measure, Mr. Trump added, “It’s only hours old.”

Trump specifically addressed his anger about the 2,322-page spending bill that lawmakers could not have possibly even begun to have read before voting on the measure. The House version of the bill made it to the floor on Thursday after just 16 hours of debate; all four Colorado Republican members of Congress voted to end discussion, moving things along with a narrow 211-207 result. Colorado Reps. Mike Coffman (R-Aurora) and Ken Buck (R-Greeley) were ultimately able to vote “YES” and “NO” on the proposal (Coffman and Buck voted YES on the procedural move before pressing the “NO” button on the final vote).

Senator Cory Gardner (R-Yuma).

Over in the Senate, the spending bill passed with 62 votes; Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Denver) voted “YES” and Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Yuma) was a “NO.” Gardner’s vote is particularly interesting because the bill included the “Fix NICS” background check provision that Gardner had been blocking for weeks. The next time Gardner pretends to be concerned about gun violence, remember that he prevented the popular background fix measure from being debated in the Senate and ultimately voted against its final approval.

What else do we know about the giant omnibus spending bill? As CNN’s Gregory Krieg explains, it’s important to consider everything that was NOT bundled into the legislation, such as: 1) DACA and immigration reform, 2) Billions of dollars for Trump’s border wall, and 3) Serious attempts at preventing gun violence, including no new limits on gun purchases.

How did this all happen so quickly? As Sarah Binder writes for the Washington Post, this was Republican strategerie at work:

One of the reasons GOP leaders were keen to rush the bill to a vote is that they didn’t want their partisan base to notice that it both funds innumerable Democratic priorities and blocks the Trump administration from doing such things as expanding detention of immigrants, defunding sanctuary cities, and ending federal funding for the arts, to name a few. [Pols emphasis] The Trump White House and many conservatives wanted deep cuts to domestic programs. Party leaders ignored that. The more quickly the two chambers vote, the less time potential opponents have to unearth details that could outrage the GOP base, who might pressure their representatives to vote against the deal.

To summarize, Congressional Republicans rammed through a humongous spending bill that they didn’t read and didn’t really like that does very little to address their political vulnerabilities on gun violence and immigration reform…and will also likely anger their base of supporters.

13 Community Comments, Facebook Comments

  1. unnamed says:

    Stay the course Senator.  Make sure Teachers get guns in classrooms that they can injure students with. They'll thank you.

  2. ZappateroZappatero says:

    Both senators marked a course in cowardice. It’s safe and a good way to become a SFL. Especially when you know you won’t get any criticism from your own side. 

  3. JohnInDenver says:

    Only 174 days into the current budget year, we finally have a budget.

    No doubt, wanting to avoid this in the future, we will soon see the Senate and House follow the calendar for the orderly consideration of the FY2019 bill. Of course, one of the first dates for Congressional action is April 1 — when the Senate will be on a "State Work period" [aka Spring Recess]. So, there's a guarantee THAT date will be missed.

  4. MichaelBowmanMichaelBowman says:

    Hey Nutlid, are you on the fainting couch?

  5. Gilpin Guy says:

    The narrative says the Republicans put together this bill but it has a lot of stuff in it that would indicate some kind of collaboration.  Interesting concept if Republican and Democratic staffs are working together to maintain a functioning government.

    • DavieDavie says:

      Reality is sinking in on the GOP side that Trump is an unreliable partner.  Trump's manic swings between one decision or another leaves GOP leadership with few options but to find a middle ground, since they know the nut-wingers will be the tail wagging the dog otherwise.

       

  6. mamajama55mamajama55 says:

    Get on the OmniBUSSSS!!!! In addition to the "No money for the wall", Maddow, CNN, and the Daily Beast are reporting that the bill funds Russian sanctions  (supporting internet freedom in Russia, barring Federal contracts with sanctioned Russian entities, in a five-page section titled “Countering Russian Influence and Aggression").

    Somehow, nobody will admit to sneaking the 5 page section into the omnibus bill. Its origin remains a mystery 😎….

Leave a Reply

Comment from your Facebook account


You may comment with your Colorado Pols account above (click here to register), or via Facebook below.