CO-04 (Special Election) See Full Big Line

(R) Greg Lopez

(R) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%↓

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

90%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

90%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

(R) Ron Hanks

40%

30%

20%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(R) Deborah Flora

(R) J. Sonnenberg

30%↑

15%↑

10%↓

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Dave Williams

(R) Jeff Crank

50%↓

50%↑

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

90%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) Brittany Pettersen

85%↑

 

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

(R) Janak Joshi

60%↑

35%↓

30%↑

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
February 09, 2018 11:58 PM UTC

Weekend Open Thread

  • 19 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Fear not, the people may be deluded for a moment, but cannot be corrupted.”

–Andrew Jackson

Comments

19 thoughts on “Weekend Open Thread

  1. Colorado is on the radar for Democratic resistance to gerrymandering. Holder and Obama's National Democratic Redistricting Commission is on the case. Colorado should really have an 8th US House seat, due to population growth.

    Fair Districts Colorado (FDC)

    is the group that wants to minimize the impact of the Blue Wave by increasing the power of unaffiliated voters.  FDC has 5 fricking initiatives for the 2018 ballot.

    Eric Holder on Maddow recently, talking about the NDRC's work:

    “People want to save our democracy”.

      1. I fixed the link to the Denver Post article, which summarized FDC's 3 ballot initiatives as of September, 2017. From Brian Eason's article:

        The three ballot initiatives seek to dilute the influence of the two major political parties in the state’s redistricting process by putting more unaffiliated voters on the commissions tasked with drawing the lines for state legislative and congressional districts.

        Anschutz' paper, the Gazette, also has a pro-FDC article, promoted on FDC's website.

        Pols had this take on FDC's crusades, posted not long ago. They called the redistricting effort "Smoke and Mirrors".

        The Democratic critique of the FDC proposals is twofold: 1) that the process for appointing "unaffiliated" commissioners for the redistricting group is itself flawed and partisan, and 2) deep suspicion of the makeup of the Fair Districts group itself, being comprised primarily of libertarian and Republican operatives.

        For example, there are no voter advocacy groups on board, such as Common Cause, Mi Familia Vota, or other civil rights groups. League of Women Voters is listed as a “coalition partner” with FDC. However, leadership of the LWV is divided on support for the redistricting initiatives, and when filed, LWV will not be listed as an endorser.

        No other civil rights groups have gotten on board. It’s worth asking why not.

        The 5 initiatives can be found on the Colorado General Assembly website. Here's the text to #95 and #96,  #69 #68 and #67

         

         

         

      1. Yes,  PR, I think that FDC's redistricting efforts are strategic. They're conceding that they exist in a time and place that favors Democrats this year, and are trying hard to minimize Democratic gains. If the FDC initiatives pass, it won't help elect Republicans to statewide offices or CD4 in 2018 midterms, but it may help the GOP in 2020.

        If they can appeal to Colorado's unaffiliated voters with a supposed "bipartisan" plea, they are more than happy to make that case. And yes, it is supposed to help Republicans, or at least the Republican agenda. 

        It hardly matters if there is a D or an R in front of legislator names, if the policies that are allowed to pass are favorable to say, pharmaceutical, finance, or oil and gas industry interests.  It will help for Statehouse control, of course.

        Don't get me wrong – I will work for Democrats in 2018 and 2020. But I will work for the most progressive candidates possible, because they will work for the most progressive policies possible.

    1. Channel 7's reporting 8 inches at the station, which is half a mile from us. But it’s wet, bloppy stuff so I think a lot of it’s melting rather than accumulating.

  2. Adopting, internalizing, and transmitting Republican Economic and Budgetary rhetoric is a key Democratic FAILURE of the last several decades.

    Only crazy liberal bloggers have been stupid enough to claim, for years, that Republicans didn't care about "fiscal responsibility" but that they just wanted tax cuts for rich people, drastic cuts to social programs, and regulation friendly to big businesses.

    Base Republican voters mostly care about racism and pissing off the libs.

    Also, too, the Tea Party wasn't about "Teh Deficit" and wasn't some nonpartisan transpartisan coalition. It was racist Republicans.

    “How did we miss the Trump phenomenon?” wonder political journalists on their 87th visit to a Pennsyltucky diner. Because you have been willingly peddling misinformation about your supposed field of expertise for decades.

  3. Colorado Senate GOP put up a high quality video, "Under the Golden Dome" touting their sponsored legislation. Lots of funny head shots of the Nevilles, Lundberg, Marble, Grantham, Sonnenberg, and Baumgardner.

    My question:  Why don't Democratic legislators put up a video like this that celebrates their accomplishments? Or do they?

     

    And for the Republicans: Why aren't you celebrating and promoting your Americans for Prosperity Colorado lobby day, with the free box lunch, and all the fixins?

    Perhaps Grantham, the Nevilles, Vicki Marble, Ray Scott, Lori Saine, and all the crew don't want you to know how much they will owe to the Koch brothers when all is said and done.

     

     

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

114 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!